Phase segmentation of X-ray computer tomography rock images using
machine learning techniques: an accuracy and performance
study
-
Published:2016-07-19
Issue:4
Volume:7
Page:1125-1139
-
ISSN:1869-9529
-
Container-title:Solid Earth
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Solid Earth
Author:
Chauhan Swarup, Rühaak WolframORCID, Anbergen Hauke, Kabdenov Alen, Freise Marcus, Wille Thorsten, Sass Ingo
Abstract
Abstract. Performance and accuracy of machine learning techniques to segment rock grains, matrix and pore voxels from a 3-D volume of X-ray tomographic (XCT) grayscale rock images was evaluated. The segmentation and classification capability of unsupervised (k-means, fuzzy c-means, self-organized maps), supervised (artificial neural networks, least-squares support vector machines) and ensemble classifiers (bragging and boosting) were tested using XCT images of andesite volcanic rock, Berea sandstone, Rotliegend sandstone and a synthetic sample. The averaged porosity obtained for andesite (15.8 ± 2.5 %), Berea sandstone (16.3 ± 2.6 %), Rotliegend sandstone (13.4 ± 7.4 %) and the synthetic sample (48.3 ± 13.3 %) is in very good agreement with the respective laboratory measurement data and varies by a factor of 0.2. The k-means algorithm is the fastest of all machine learning algorithms, whereas a least-squares support vector machine is the most computationally expensive. Metrics entropy, purity, mean square root error, receiver operational characteristic curve and 10 K-fold cross-validation were used to determine the accuracy of unsupervised, supervised and ensemble classifier techniques. In general, the accuracy was found to be largely affected by the feature vector selection scheme. As it is always a trade-off between performance and accuracy, it is difficult to isolate one particular machine learning algorithm which is best suited for the complex phase segmentation problem. Therefore, our investigation provides parameters that can help in selecting the appropriate machine learning techniques for phase segmentation.
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Subject
Paleontology,Stratigraphy,Earth-Surface Processes,Geochemistry and Petrology,Geology,Geophysics,Soil Science
Reference47 articles.
1. Amigó, E., Gonzalo, J., Artiles, J., and Verdejo, F.: A comparison of extrinsic clustering evaluation metrics based on formal constraints, Inform. Retrieval, 12, 461–486, 2009. 2. Andrä, H., Combaret, N., Dvorkin, J., Glatt, E., Han, J., Kabel, M., Keehm, Y., Krzikalla, F., Lee, M., Madonna, C., Marsh, M., Mukerji, T., Saenger, E.H. , Sain, R., Saxena, N., Ricker, S., Wiegmann, A., and Zhan, X.: Digital rock physics benchmarks – Part I: Imaging and segmentation, Comput. Geosci., 50, 25–32, 2013. 3. Aretz, A., Bär, K., Götz, A. E., and Sass, I.: Outcrop analogue study of Permocarboniferous geo-thermal sandstone reservoir formations (northern Upper Rhine Graben, Germany): impact of mineral content, depositional environment and diagenesis on petrophysical properties, Int. J. Earth Sci., 105, 1431–1452, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00531-015-1263-2 2016. 4. Bradley, A. P.: The use of the area under the ROC curve in the evaluation of machine learning algorithms, Pattern Recogn., 30, 1145–1159. 1997. 5. Breiman, L.: Bagging predictors, Mach. Lear., 24, 123–140, 1996.
Cited by
35 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|