Biomass explains the intensity of facilitative – not competitive – interactions: three intraspecific tests with annuals
-
Published:2012-10-01
Issue:1
Volume:12
Page:49-55
-
ISSN:1399-1183
-
Container-title:Web Ecology
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Web Ecol.
Author:
Ariza C.,Tielbörger K.
Abstract
Abstract. Despite efforts to discern the role of plant size in resource competition, the circumstances under which size-dependent plant-plant interactions occur are still unclear. The traditional assumption is that competition intensifies with increasing neighbour size. However, recent studies suggest that the size (biomass) dependence of competitive interactions is strongest at very low biomass levels and becomes negligible after a certain threshold neighbour biomass has been reached. We searched for the generality of such patterns for three common annual plant species in Israel. We monitored target and neighbour biomass along their entire lifecycle using an even-aged, intraspecific and intrapopulation competition screenhouse experiment under water-limited conditions. For all focal species, neighbour presence had a net negative effect on vegetative biomass at harvest. However, this was not explained by increasing neighbour biomass over time, as a consistent pattern of size-dependent facilitative, rather than competitive, interactions was observed at all life stages. We explain these observations in terms of co-occurring aboveground facilitation and dominant belowground competition for water. Since our findings are the first of their kind and contradict theoretical predictions of biomass dependence of net negative interactions, we advocate further experiments addressing size dependence in interactions among plants. In particular, theoretical models addressing size dependence of positive interactions must be developed.
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Subject
Ecology,Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
Reference33 articles.
1. Armas, C., Ordiales, R., and Pugnaire, F. I.: Measuring plant interactions: a new comparative index, Ecology, 85, 2682–2686, 2004. 2. Bazzaz, F. A., Chiariello, N. R., Coley, P. D., and Pitelka, L. F.: Allocating resources to reproduction and defense, BioScience, 37, 58–67, 1987. 3. Bonan, G. B.: Density effects on the size structure of annual plant populations: an indication of neighbourhood competition, Ann. Bot., 68, 341–347, 1991. 4. Bonser, S. P. and Reader, R. J.: Plant competition and herbivory in relation to vegetation biomass, Ecology, 76, 2176–2183, 1995. 5. Brooker, R. E., Maestre, F. T., Callaway, R. M., Lortie, C. L., Cavieres, L., Kunstler, G., Liancourt, P., Tielbörger, K., Travis, J. M., Anthelme, F., Armas, C., Coll, L., Corcket, E., Delzon, S., Forey, E., Kikvidze, Z., Pugnaire, F., Saccone, P., Schiffers, K., Seifan, M., Touzard, B., and Michalet, R.: Facilitation in plant communities: the past, the present and the future, J. Ecol., 96, 18–34, 2008.
Cited by
6 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|