Suitability of the CICE sea ice model for seasonal prediction and positive impact of CryoSat-2 ice thickness initialization
-
Published:2024-07-03
Issue:7
Volume:18
Page:3033-3048
-
ISSN:1994-0424
-
Container-title:The Cryosphere
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:The Cryosphere
Author:
Sun Shan,Solomon Amy
Abstract
Abstract. The Los Alamos Community Ice CodE (CICE) sea ice model is being tested in standalone mode to identify biases that limit its suitability for seasonal prediction, where it is driven by atmospheric forcings from the NCEP Climate Forecast System Reanalysis (CFSR) and a built-in mixed-layer ocean model in CICE. The initial conditions for the sea ice and mixed-layer ocean are also from CFSR in the control experiments. The simulated sea ice extent agrees well with observations during the warm season at all lead times up to 12 months, in both the Arctic and the Antarctic. This suggests that CICE is able to provide useful sea ice edge information for seasonal prediction. However, the model's initial conditions have ice that is too thick in the Beaufort Sea, resulting in excessive ice extent in the Arctic at 6-month lead forecasts and errors in ice volume at all lead times when compared to available observations. To address this limitation, additional CS2_IC experiments were conducted, where the Arctic ice thickness was initialized using CryoSat-2 satellite observations while keeping all other initial fields the same as in the control experiments. This reduced the positive bias in the ice thickness in the initial conditions, leading to improvements in both the simulated ice edge and the ice thickness at the seasonal timescale. This indicates that CICE has the potential to improve its seasonal forecast skill and provide more accurate predictions of sea ice extent and thickness when initialized with a more realistic sea ice thickness. This study highlights that the suitability of CICE for seasonal prediction depends on various factors, including initial conditions such as sea ice thickness, in addition to sea ice coverage, as well as oceanic and atmospheric conditions.
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Reference56 articles.
1. ACIA: Arctic Climate Impact Assessment. ACIA Overview report, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U. K., ISBN 0 521 86509 3, 2005. a 2. Allard, R. A., Farrell, S. L., Hebert, D. A., Johnston, W. F., Li, L., Kurtz, N. T., Phelps, M. W., Posey, P. G., Tilling, R., Ridout, A., and Wallcraft, A. J.: Utilizing CryoSat-2 sea ice thickness to initialize a coupled ice–ocean modeling system, Adv. Space Res., 62, 1265–1280, 2018. a, b 3. Amante, C. and Eakins, B. W.: ETOPO1 1 Arc-Minute Global Relief Model: Procedures, Data Sources and Analysis, NOAA Technical Memorandum NESDIS NGDC-24, National Geophysical Data Center, NOAA [data set], https://www.ncei.noaa.gov/products/etopo-global-relief-model/ (last access: 21 June 2016), 2009. a, b 4. Arribas, A., Glover, M., Maidens, A., Peterson, K., Gordon, M., Maclachlan, C., Graham, R., Fereday, D., Camp, J., Scaife, A. A., Xavier, P., Mclean, P., Colman, A., and Cusack, S.: The GloSea4 Ensemble Prediction System for Seasonal Forecasting, Mon. Weather Rev., 139, 1891–1910, https://doi.org/10.1175/2010MWR3615.1, 2011. a 5. Blanchard-Wrigglesworth, E., Bitz, C. M., and Holland, M. M.: Influence of initial conditions and climate forcing on predicting Arctic sea ice, Geophys. Res. Lett., 38, L18503, https://doi.org/10.1029/2011GL048807, 2011a. a
|
|