Evaluation of ECMWF-IFS (version 41R1) operational model forecasts of aerosol transport by using ceilometer network measurements
-
Published:2018-09-25
Issue:9
Volume:11
Page:3807-3831
-
ISSN:1991-9603
-
Container-title:Geoscientific Model Development
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Geosci. Model Dev.
Author:
Chan Ka Lok, Wiegner Matthias, Flentje Harald, Mattis Ina, Wagner Frank, Gasteiger JosefORCID, Geiß AlexanderORCID
Abstract
Abstract. In this paper, we present a comparison of model simulations of aerosol
profiles with measurements of the ceilometer network operated by the German
Weather Service (DWD) over 1 year from September 2015 to August 2016. The
aerosol forecasts are produced by the Copernicus Atmosphere Monitoring
Service (CAMS) using the aerosol module developed within the Global and
regional Earth-system Monitoring using Satellite and in-situ data (GEMS) and
Monitoring Atmospheric Composition and Climate (MACC) projects and coupled
into the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts Integrated
Forecasting System (ECMWF-IFS). As the model output provides mass mixing ratios
of different types of aerosol, whereas the ceilometers do not, it is necessary
to determine a common physical quantity for the comparison. We have chosen
the attenuated backscatter β∗ for this purpose. The
β∗ profiles are calculated from the mass mixing ratios of the model
output assuming the inherent aerosol microphysical properties. Comparison of
the attenuated backscatter averaged between an altitude of 0.2 km (typical
overlap range of ceilometers) and 1 km in general shows similar annual
average values. However, the standard deviation of the difference between
model and observation is larger than the average in 8 out of 12 sites. To investigate possible reasons for the differences, we have examined the
role of the hygroscopic growth of particles and the particle shape. Our
results show that using a more recent particle growth model would result in a
∼22 % reduction of particle backscatter for sea salt aerosols,
corresponding to a 10 % reduction of the total backscatter signal on
average. Accounting for nonspherical dust particles in the model would reduce
attenuated backscatter of dust particles by ∼30 %. As the
concentration of dust aerosol is in general very low in Germany, a
significant effect on the total backscatter signal is restricted to dust
episodes. In summary, consideration of both effects tends to improve the
agreement between model and observations but without leading to a perfect
consistency. In addition, a strong Saharan dust event was investigated to study the
agreement of the spatiotemporal distribution of particles. It was found that
the arrival time of the dust layer and its vertical extent very well agree
between model and ceilometer measurements for several stations. This
underlines the potential of a network of ceilometers to validate the
dispersion of aerosol layers.
Funder
FP7 People: Marie-Curie Actions H2020 Environment
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Reference71 articles.
1. Ansmann, A., Bösenberg, J., Chaikovsky, A., Comerón, A., Eckhardt, S.,
Eixmann, R., Freudenthaler, V., Ginoux, P., Komguem, L., Linné, H.,
Márquez, M. n. L., Matthias, V., Mattis, I., Mitev, V., Müller, D., Music,
S., Nickovic, S., Pelon, J., Sauvage, L., Sobolewsky, P., Srivastava, M. K.,
Stohl, A., Torres, O., Vaughan, G., Wandinger, U., and Wiegner, M.:
Long-range transport of Saharan dust to northern Europe: The 11-16
October 2001 outbreak observed with EARLINET, J. Geophys.
Res.-Atmos., 108, 4783, https://doi.org/10.1029/2003JD003757,
2003. a 2. Baklanov, A., Schlünzen, K., Suppan, P., Baldasano, J., Brunner, D.,
Aksoyoglu, S., Carmichael, G., Douros, J., Flemming, J., Forkel, R.,
Galmarini, S., Gauss, M., Grell, G., Hirtl, M., Joffre, S., Jorba, O., Kaas,
E., Kaasik, M., Kallos, G., Kong, X., Korsholm, U., Kurganskiy, A., Kushta,
J., Lohmann, U., Mahura, A., Manders-Groot, A., Maurizi, A., Moussiopoulos,
N., Rao, S. T., Savage, N., Seigneur, C., Sokhi, R. S., Solazzo, E., Solomos,
S., Sørensen, B., Tsegas, G., Vignati, E., Vogel, B., and Zhang, Y.:
Online coupled regional meteorology chemistry models in Europe: current
status and prospects, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 317–398,
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-317-2014, 2014. a 3. Balzarini, A., Pirovano, G., Honzak, L., Žabkar, R., Curci, G., Forkel,
R.,
Hirtl, M., José, R. S., Tuccella, P., and Grell, G.: WRF-Chem model
sensitivity to chemical mechanisms choice in reconstructing aerosol optical
properties, Atmos. Environ., 115, 604–619,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.12.033, 2015. a 4. Barrett, E. W. and Ben-Dov, O.: Application of the Lidar to Air Pollution
Measurements, J. Appl. Meteorol., 6, 500–515,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0450(1967)006<0500:AOTLTA>2.0.CO;2, 1967. a 5. Bechtold, P., Kohler, M., Jung, T., Doblas-Reyes, F., Leutbecher, M.,
Rodwell,
M. J., Vitart, F., and Balsamo, G.: Advances in simulating atmospheric
variability with the ECMWF model: From synoptic to decadal time-scales,
Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 134, 1337–1351,
https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.289, 2008. a
Cited by
20 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|