Flood patterns in a catchment with mixed bedrock geology and a hilly landscape: identification of flashy runoff contributions during storm events
-
Published:2022-10-14
Issue:19
Volume:26
Page:5185-5206
-
ISSN:1607-7938
-
Container-title:Hydrology and Earth System Sciences
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci.
Author:
Douinot Audrey, Iffly Jean François, Tailliez Cyrille, Meisch ClaudeORCID, Pfister LaurentORCID
Abstract
Abstract. With flash flood events having been repeatedly observed in Central and
Western Europe in recent years, there is a growing interest in how catchment
physiographic properties and hydrological conditions are eventually
controlling rapid and concentrated hydrological responses. Here we focus on
a set of two nested catchments in Luxembourg (Europe) that have been exposed
in 2016 and 2018 to flash flood events and study their seasonal runoff time
transfer distributions. Both catchments are of similar size (∼ 30 km2) and have analogous hydrological distance distributions, but
their geological bedrock and landscape features are notably different. The
upper catchment (KOE) is dominated by a low land area (38 % of the
catchment is located less than 30 m above the river network) consisting of
variegated marly bedrock (middle Keuper Km3) and moderately steep Luxembourg
sandstone outcrops (lower Liassic Li2). The lower catchment (HM) has its
drainage network deeply cut into the Luxembourg sandstone, with half of it
being covered by marly plateaus (Lower Liassic Li3, located between 80 and
100 m above the river network) featuring heavy clay soil. Based on data
generated from a dedicated hydro-meteorological monitoring network, we
calculated for 40 rainfall–runoff events observed between August 2019 and
July 2021 the corresponding net rainfall transfer time distributions (TTDs)
from the hillslopes to the catchment outlet. We then compared the TTD
properties and related them to the catchment's hydrological state and
rainfall properties. We observed a marked seasonality in TTDs for both catchments. The KOE
catchment reacts fastest during the winter period (December–February),
while its response time is most delayed and spread out during periods of
catchment recharging (October–November) and drying (March–May). The HM
catchment exhibits similar TTDs during the mid-October to mid-April period,
but they diverge markedly during the remaining part of the year, with
opposite variations. During the mid-April to mid-October period, the average
response time increases progressively in the KOE catchment. This behavior
is in stark contrast to the HM catchment, where response times are
significantly shorter (peak discharge delay time decreases by −70 % ± 28 %) and more concentrated (runoff volume occurring in 1 h
increases by +48 % ± 87 %) during the mid-April to mid-October,
in comparison to the extended winter period. This opposite seasonality leads
us to consider different control factors of the runoff transfer processes in
relation with the topographic and geological layout of the catchment areas.
In the KOE catchment, we found the TTD to be essentially driven by onset and
cessation of hydrological connectivity on the flat marly terrain – the
latter operating like a variable contributing area in terms of deep soil
storage dynamics (except for one summer event). The HM section exhibits
contrasted TTDs throughout the year, suggesting threshold-dependent
hydrological processes. More specifically, particularly quick runoff
transfers seem to dominate under dry conditions (mid-April to mid-October).
Correlation analyses compared to the literature on runoff generation on the
one hand and our descriptive knowledge of the catchments on the other hand
suggest multiple causes for the triggering of these rapid flows. The
fractured marly plateaus, but also the hydrophobic forest litter forming
during dry conditions on steep slopes, stand as our main hypotheses in this
respect. Moreover, the absence of a riparian zone, preventing any dampening
of (observed) abrupt and massive flows during extreme precipitation events,
also seems to be a key feature of the rapid runoff transfer. For improving our understanding and forecasting capabilities in Luxembourg
(and more broadly in the nearby regions of Germany, Belgium, and France with
similar physiographic and climate conditions), we recommend further studies
focusing on catchments with fractured bedrock and limited riparian zones.
Special attention may equally be given to the hypothesized responses of
hydrophobic soil surfaces on steep hillslopes and marly soils to heavy
precipitation events occurring after extended dry spells.
Funder
Fonds National de la Recherche Luxembourg
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Subject
General Earth and Planetary Sciences,General Engineering,General Environmental Science
Reference64 articles.
1. adouinot: adouinot/TransitTimeModel: TransferTimeModel V1.0.0 (1.0.0), Zenodo [code], https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7181809, 2022. 2. Asano, Y., Uchida, T., and Tomomura, M.: A Novel Method of Quantifying
Catchment-Wide Average Peak Propagation Speed in Hillslopes: Fast Hillslope
Responses are Detected During Annual Floods in a Steep Humid Catchment,
Water Resour. Res., 56, e2019WR025070, https://doi.org/10.1029/2019WR025070, 2020. 3. Anderson, A. E., Weiler, M., Alila, Y., and Hudson, R. O.: Subsurface flow
velocities in a hillslope with lateral preferential flow, Water Resour.
Res., 45, W11407, https://doi.org/10.1029/2008WR007121, 2009. 4. Berghuijs, W. R., Allen, S. T., Harrigan, S., and Kirchner, J. W.: Growing
Spatial Scales of Synchronous River Flooding in Europe, Geophys. Res.
Lett., 46, 1423–1428, https://doi.org/10.1029/2018GL081883, 2019. 5. Bergstrom, A., Jencso, K., and McGlynn, B.: Spatiotemporal processes that
contribute to hydrologic exchange between hillslopes, valley bottoms, and
streams, Water Resour. Res., 52, 4628–4645,
https://doi.org/10.1002/2015WR017972, 2016.
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|