A data-driven method for estimating the composition of end-members from stream water chemistry time series
-
Published:2022-04-22
Issue:8
Volume:26
Page:1977-1991
-
ISSN:1607-7938
-
Container-title:Hydrology and Earth System Sciences
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci.
Author:
Xu Fei EstherORCID, Harman Ciaran JosephORCID
Abstract
Abstract. End-member mixing analysis (EMMA) is a method of interpreting stream water chemistry variations and is widely used for chemical hydrograph separation. It is based on the assumption that stream water is a conservative mixture of varying contributions from well-characterized source solutions (end-members). These end-members are typically identified by collecting samples of potential end-member source waters from within the watershed and comparing these to the observations. Here we introduce a complementary data-driven method (convex hull end-member mixing analysis – CHEMMA) to infer the end-member compositions and their associated uncertainties from the stream water observations alone. The method involves two steps. The first uses convex hull nonnegative matrix factorization (CH-NMF) to infer possible end-member compositions by searching for a simplex that optimally encloses the stream water observations. The second step uses constrained K-means clustering (COP-KMEANS) to classify the results from repeated applications of CH-NMF and analyzes the uncertainty associated with the algorithm. In an example application utilizing the 1986 to 1988 Panola Mountain Research Watershed dataset, CHEMMA is able to robustly reproduce the three field-measured end-members found in previous research using only the stream water chemical observations. CHEMMA also suggests that a fourth and a fifth end-member can be (less robustly) identified. We examine uncertainties in end-member identification arising from non-uniqueness, which is related to the data structure, of the CH-NMF solutions, and from the number of samples using both real and synthetic data. The results suggest that the mixing space can be identified robustly when the dataset includes samples that contain extremely small contributions of one end-member, i.e., samples containing extremely large contributions from one end-member are not necessary but do reduce uncertainty about the end-member composition.
Funder
Directorate for Geosciences
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Subject
General Earth and Planetary Sciences,General Engineering,General Environmental Science
Reference39 articles.
1. Ali, G. A., Roy, A. G., Turmel, M. C., and Courchesne, F.: Source-to-stream
connectivity assessment through end-member mixing analysis, J. Hydrol., 392, 119–135, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2010.07.049, 2010. a 2. Ashley, R. and Lloyd, J.: An example of the use of factor analysis and cluster analysis in groundwater chemistry interpretation, J. Hydrol., 39,
355–364, 1978. a 3. Babaki, B.: COP-Kmeans version 1.5, Zenodo, https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.831850, 2017. a 4. Barbeta, A. and Peñuelas, J.: Relative contribution of groundwater to
plant transpiration estimated with stable isotopes, Scient. Rep., 7, 1–10, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-09643-x, 2017. a 5. Barthold, F. K., Tyralla, C., Schneider, K., Vaché, K. B., Frede, H.-G.,
and Breuer, L.: How many tracers do we need for end member mixing analysis (EMMA)? A sensitivity analysis, Water Resour. Res., 47, 1–14,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2011WR010604, 2011. a
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|