Karst spring recession and classification: efficient, automated methods for both fast- and slow-flow components
-
Published:2022-11-01
Issue:21
Volume:26
Page:5431-5447
-
ISSN:1607-7938
-
Container-title:Hydrology and Earth System Sciences
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci.
Author:
Olarinoye TundeORCID, Gleeson TomORCID, Hartmann AndreasORCID
Abstract
Abstract. Analysis of karst spring recession hydrographs is essential for determining
hydraulic parameters, geometric characteristics, and transfer mechanisms that describe the dynamic nature of karst aquifer systems. The extraction and separation of different fast- and slow-flow components constituting a karst spring recession hydrograph typically involve manual and subjective
procedures. This subjectivity introduces a bias that exists, while manual procedures can introduce errors into the derived parameters representing the system. To provide an alternative recession extraction procedure that is automated, fully objective, and easy to apply, we modified traditional streamflow extraction methods to identify components relevant for karst spring recession analysis. Mangin's karst-specific recession analysis model was fitted to individual extracted recession segments to determine matrix and conduit recession parameters. We introduced different parameter optimization approaches into Mangin's model to increase the degree of freedom, thereby allowing for more parameter interaction. The modified recession extraction and parameter optimization approaches were tested on three karst springs under different climate conditions. Our results showed that the modified extraction methods are capable of distinguishing different recession components and derived parameters that reasonably represent the analyzed karst systems. We recorded an average Kling–Gupta efficiency KGE > 0.85 among all recession events simulated by the recession parameters derived from all combinations of recession extraction methods and parameter optimization approaches. While there are variabilities among parameters estimated by different combinations of extraction methods, optimization approaches, and seasons, we found much higher variability among individual recession events. We provided suggestions to reduce the uncertainty among individual recession events and raised questions about how to improve confidence in the system's attributes derived from recession parameters.
Funder
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Subject
General Earth and Planetary Sciences,General Engineering,General Environmental Science
Reference51 articles.
1. Aksoy, H. and Wittenberg, H.: Nonlinear baseflow recession analysis in
watersheds with intermittent streamflow, Hydrolog. Sci. J., 56, 226–237,
https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2011.553614, 2011. 2. Amit, H., Lyakhovsky, V., Katz, A., Starinsky, A., and Burg, A.:
Interpretation of Spring Recession Curves, Ground Water, 40, 543–551,
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6584.2002.tb02539.x, 2002. 3. Arciniega-Esparza, S., Breña-Naranjo, J. A., Pedrozo-Acuña, A., and
Appendini, C. M.: HYDRORECESSION: A Matlab toolbox for streamflow recession
analysis, Comput. Geosci., 98, 87–92, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2016.10.005, 2017. 4. Atkinson, T. C.: Diffuse flow and conduit flow in limestone terrain in the
Mendip Hills, Somerset (Great Britain), J. Hydrol., 35, 93–110,
https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1694(77)90079-8, 1977. 5. Beck, H. E., Zimmermann, N. E., Mcvicar, T. R., Vergopolan, N., Berg, A.,
and Wood, E. F.: Data Descriptor: Present and future Köppen-Geiger
climate classification maps at 1-km resolution, Sci. Data, 5, 180214,
https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2018.214, 2018.
Cited by
10 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|