PCR-GLOBWB 2: a 5 arcmin global hydrological and water resources model
-
Published:2018-06-20
Issue:6
Volume:11
Page:2429-2453
-
ISSN:1991-9603
-
Container-title:Geoscientific Model Development
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Geosci. Model Dev.
Author:
Sutanudjaja Edwin H.ORCID, van Beek RensORCID, Wanders NikoORCID, Wada YoshihideORCID, Bosmans Joyce H. C.ORCID, Drost NielsORCID, van der Ent Ruud J., de Graaf Inge E. M., Hoch Jannis M.ORCID, de Jong KorORCID, Karssenberg DerekORCID, López López Patricia, Peßenteiner Stefanie, Schmitz OliverORCID, Straatsma Menno W.ORCID, Vannametee Ekkamol, Wisser Dominik, Bierkens Marc F. P.ORCID
Abstract
Abstract. We present PCR-GLOBWB 2, a global
hydrology and water resources model. Compared to previous versions of
PCR-GLOBWB, this version fully integrates water use. Sector-specific water
demand, groundwater and surface water withdrawal, water consumption, and
return flows are dynamically calculated at every time step and interact
directly with the simulated hydrology. PCR-GLOBWB 2 has been fully rewritten
in Python and PCRaster Python and has a modular structure, allowing easier
replacement, maintenance, and development of model components. PCR-GLOBWB 2
has been implemented at 5 arcmin resolution, but a version parameterized at
30 arcmin resolution is also available. Both versions are available as
open-source codes on https://github.com/UU-Hydro/PCR-GLOBWB_model
(Sutanudjaja et al., 2017a). PCR-GLOBWB 2 has its own routines for
groundwater dynamics and surface water routing. These relatively simple
routines can alternatively be replaced by dynamically coupling PCR-GLOBWB 2
to a global two-layer groundwater model and 1-D–2-D hydrodynamic models.
Here, we describe the main components of the model, compare results of the 30
and 5 arcmin versions, and evaluate their model performance using Global
Runoff Data Centre discharge data. Results show that model performance of the
5 arcmin version is notably better than that of the 30 arcmin version.
Furthermore, we compare simulated time series of total water storage (TWS) of
the 5 arcmin model with those observed with GRACE, showing similar negative
trends in areas of prevalent groundwater depletion. Also, we find that
simulated total water withdrawal matches reasonably well with reported water
withdrawal from AQUASTAT, while water withdrawal by source and sector provide
mixed results.
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Reference127 articles.
1. Alfieri, L., Burek, P., Dutra, E., Krzeminski, B., Muraro, D., Thielen, J.,
and Pappenberger, F.: GloFAS – global ensemble streamflow forecasting and
flood early warning, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 17, 1161–1175,
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-17-1161-2013, 2013. 2. Allen, R. G., Pereira, L. S., Raes, D., and Smith, M.: Crop evaporation:
Guidelines for computing crop requirements, UN-FAO, Rome, Italy, 1998. 3. Argent, R. M.: An overview of model integration for environmental
applications–components, frameworks and semantics, Environ. Model. Softw.,
19, 219–234, https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-8152(03)00150-6, 2004. 4. Bates, P. D., Horritt, M. S., and Fewtrell, T. J.: A simple inertial
formulation of the shallow water equations for efficient twodimensional flood
inundation modelling, J. Hydrol., 38, 33–45, 2010. 5. Bergström, S.: The HBV model, in: Computer Models in Watershed Hydrology,
edited by: Singh, V. P., Water Resources Publications, Highlands Ranch, CO,
1995.
Cited by
338 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|