A run control framework to streamline profiling, porting, and tuning simulation runs and provenance tracking of geoscientific applications
-
Published:2018-07-13
Issue:7
Volume:11
Page:2875-2895
-
ISSN:1991-9603
-
Container-title:Geoscientific Model Development
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Geosci. Model Dev.
Author:
Sharples Wendy, Zhukov Ilya, Geimer Markus, Goergen Klaus, Luehrs Sebastian, Breuer Thomas, Naz BibiORCID, Kulkarni Ketan, Brdar SlavkoORCID, Kollet Stefan
Abstract
Abstract. Geoscientific modeling is constantly evolving, with next-generation geoscientific models and applications placing large demands on high-performance computing (HPC) resources. These demands are being met by new developments in HPC architectures, software libraries, and infrastructures. In addition to the challenge of new massively parallel HPC systems, reproducibility of simulation and analysis results is of great concern. This is due to the fact that next-generation geoscientific models are based on complex model implementations and profiling, modeling, and data processing workflows. Thus, in order to reduce both the duration and the cost of code migration, aid in the development of new models or model components, while ensuring reproducibility and sustainability over the complete data life cycle, an automated approach to profiling, porting, and provenance tracking is necessary. We propose a run control framework (RCF) integrated with a workflow engine as a best practice approach to automate profiling, porting, provenance tracking, and simulation runs. Our RCF encompasses all stages of the modeling chain: (1) preprocess input, (2) compilation of code (including code instrumentation with performance analysis tools), (3) simulation run, and (4) postprocessing and analysis, to address these issues. Within this RCF, the workflow engine is used to create and manage benchmark or simulation parameter combinations and performs the documentation and data organization for reproducibility. In this study, we outline this approach and highlight the subsequent developments scheduled for implementation born out of the extensive profiling of ParFlow. We show that in using our run control framework, testing, benchmarking, profiling, and running models is less time consuming and more robust than running geoscientific applications in an ad hoc fashion, resulting in more efficient use of HPC resources, more strategic code development, and enhanced data integrity and reproducibility.
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Reference60 articles.
1. Alonso, P., Badia, R. M., Labarta, J., Barreda, M., Dolz, M. F., Mayo, R., Quintana-Orti, E. S., and Reyes, R.: Tools for Power-Energy Modelling and Analysis of Parallel Scientific Applications, in: 2012 41st International Conference on Parallel Processing, 420–429, https://doi.org/10.1109/ICPP.2012.57, 2012. 2. Ashby, S. F. and Falgout, R. D.: A parallel multigrid preconditioned conjugate gradient algorithm for groundwater flow simulations, Nucl. Sci. Eng., 124, 145–159, 1996. 3. Attig, N., Gibbon, P., and Lippert, T.: Trends in supercomputing: The European path to exascale, Comput. Phys. Commun., 182, 2041–2046, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpc.2010.11.011, 2011. 4. Bahra, A.: Managing work flows with ecFlow, ECMWF Newsletter,. Tech. Rep., 129, 30–32, 2011. 5. Bierkens, M. F. P., Bell, V. A., Burek, P., Chaney, N., Condon, L. E., David, C. H., de Roo, A., Döll, P., Drost, N., Famiglietti, J. S., Flörke, M., Gochis, D. J., Houser, P., Hut, R., Keune, J., Kollet, S., Maxwell, R. M., Reager, J. T., Samaniego, L., Sudicky, E., Sutanudjaja, E. H., van de Giesen, N., Winsemius, H., and Wood, E. F.: Hyper-resolution global hydrological modelling: what is next?, Hydrol. Proc., 29, 310–320, https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.10391, 2015.
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|