Author:
Marshall J. A.,Castillo A. J.,Cardenas M. B.
Abstract
Abstract. Our objective is to characterize and assess upper division and graduate student thinking in hydrology. We accomplish this through development and testing of an assessment tool for a physical hydrology class. Students were asked to respond to two questions that probed understanding and one question that assessed their ability to apply their knowledge. Student and expert responses to the questions were then used to develop a rubric to score responses. Using the rubric, three researchers independently blind-coded the full set of pre and post artifacts, resulting in 89% inter-rater agreement on the pre-tests and 83% agreement on the post-tests. This result has limitations, including the small number of participants who were all from one institution and the fact that the rubric was still under development. Nevertheless, the high inter-rater agreement from a group of experts is significant; the rubric we developed is a potentially useful tool for assessment of learning and understanding physical hydrology.
Reference31 articles.
1. Achieve, Inc.: Next Generation Science Standards, available at: http://www.achieve.org/next-generation-science-standards (last access: 31 August 2012), 2012.
2. Ben-Zvi Assarf, O. and Orion, N.: A study of junior high students' perceptions of the water cycle, J. Geosci. Ed., 53, 366–373, 2005.
3. Bourget, P. G.: Integrated water resources management curriculum in the United States: results of a recent survey, J. Contemp. Water Res. Ed., 135, 107–114, 2006.
4. Brown, J. S., Collins, A., and Duguid, P.: Situated cognition and the culture of learning, Educ. Res., 18, 32–42, 1989.
5. Corbin, J. and Strauss, A.: Grounded theory research: procedures, canons and evaluative criteria, Qual. Sociol., 13, 3–21, 1990.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献