Inferring the photolysis rate of NO2 in the stratosphere based on satellite observations
-
Published:2023-09-20
Issue:18
Volume:23
Page:10413-10422
-
ISSN:1680-7324
-
Container-title:Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Atmos. Chem. Phys.
Author:
Guan JianORCID, Solomon SusanORCID, Madronich Sasha, Kinnison DouglasORCID
Abstract
Abstract. NO and NO2 (NOx) play major roles in both
tropospheric and stratospheric chemistry. This paper provides a novel method
to obtain a global and accurate photolysis rate for NO2
based on satellite data. The photolysis rate
J(NO2) dominates the daytime diurnal variation of NOx photochemistry. Here the spatial variation of J(NO2) at 50–90∘ S in December from 20–40 km is obtained using data from the Michelson
Interferometer for Passive Atmospheric Sounding (MIPAS) experiment. Because
NO and NO2 rapidly exchange with one another in the daytime,
J(NO2) can be attained assuming steady
state, and the results are shown to be consistent with model results. The
J(NO2) value decreases as the solar zenith angle increases and has a weak altitude dependence. A key finding is that satellite-derived J(NO2) increases in the polar regions, in good agreement with model predictions, due to the effects of ice and snow on surface albedo. Thus, the method presented
here provides an observation-based check on the role of albedo in driving
polar photochemistry.
Funder
National Aeronautics and Space Administration National Institute of Food and Agriculture
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Subject
Atmospheric Science
Reference38 articles.
1. Anderson, G., Gille, J., Bailey, P., and Solomon, S.: LRIR observations of diurnal ozone variation in the mesosphere, in: Proceedings Quadrennial International Ozone Symposium, Boulder, CO, USA, 4–9 August 1980, 580–585, 1981. 2. Atkinson, R., Baulch, D. L., Cox, R. A., Crowley, J. N., Hampson, R. F., Hynes, R. G., Jenkin, M. E., Rossi, M. J., and Troe, J.: Evaluated kinetic and photochemical data for atmospheric chemistry: Volume I - gas phase reactions of OX, HOX, NOX and SOX species, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 4, 1461–1738, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-4-1461-2004, 2004. 3. Bösch, H., Camy-Peyret, C., Chipperfield, M., Fitzenberger, R., Harder,
H., Schiller, C., Schneider, M., Trautmann, T., and Pfeilsticker, K.:
Comparison of measured and modeled stratospheric UV/Visible actinic fluxes
at large solar zenith angles, Geophys. Res. Lett., 28, 1179–1182,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2000GL012134, 2001. 4. Brandt, R. E., Warren, S. G., Worby, A. P., and Grenfell, T. C.: Surface
Albedo of the Antarctic Sea Ice Zone, J. Climate, 18, 3606–3622,
https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI3489.1, 2005. 5. Burkholder, J. B., Sander, S. P., Abbatt, J. P. D., Barker, J. R., Huie, R.
E., Kolb, C. E., Kurylo, M. J., Orkin, V. L., Wilmouth, D. M., and Wine, P.
H.: Chemical kinetics and photochemical data for use in atmospheric studies:
evaluation number 18, Jet Propulsion Laboratory, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Pasadena, CA, https://jpldataeval.jpl.nasa.gov/pdf/JPL_Publication_15-10.pdf (last access: 12 September 2023), 2015.
|
|