Can corporate supply chain sustainability standards contribute to soil protection?
Author:
Frouz Jan, Čemus VojtěchORCID, Frouzová Jaroslava, Peterková Alena, Kotecký Vojtěch
Abstract
Abstract. Companies increasingly view soil degradation in their supply chains as a commercial risk. They have applied sustainability standards to manage environmental risks stemming from suppliers' farming operations. To examine the application of supply chain sustainability standards in soil protection, we conducted a study using global data on existing sustainability standards and their use in the food retail industry, a key sector in agrifood supply chains. Soil quality is a priority objective in retail sector sustainability efforts: 41 % of the investigated companies apply some soil-relevant standard. However, the standards lack specific and comprehensive criteria. Compliance typically requires that farmers are aware of soil damage risks and implement some mitigation measures; however, no measurable thresholds are usually assigned. This stands in contrast to some other provisions in a number of standards, such as deforestation criteria. There are two probable causes of this difference: companies and certification bodies have prioritised other environmental challenges (e.g. pesticide use, biodiversity loss in tropical biomes) over soil degradation. Also, there are practical constraints in the useful standardisation of soil sustainability. Effective soil sustainability provisions will require measurable, controllable, and scalable multidimensional interventions and compliance metrics. Often, these are not yet available. The development of necessary practical tools is a priority for future research.
Funder
Technology Agency of the Czech Republic
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Reference107 articles.
1. Amelung, W., Bossio, D., de Vries, W., Kögel-Knabner, I., Lehmann, J., Amundson, R., Leifeld, J., Minasny, B., Pan, G., Paustian K., Rumpel, C., Senderman, J., Van Groeningen, J. W., Mooney, S., van Wesemael, B., Wander, M., and Chabbi, A.: Towards a global-scale soil climate mitigation strategy, Nat. Commun., 11, 5427, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-18887-7, 2020. 2. Amundson, R.: The policy challenges to managing global soil resources, Geoderma, 379, 114639, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2020.114639, 2020. 3. Arvidsson, J. and Håkansson, I.: A model for estimating crop yield losses caused by soil compaction, Soil Till. Res., 20, 319–332, https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-1987(91)90046-Z, 1991. 4. Barker, N., Ely, D., Galvin, N., Shapiro, A., and Watts, A.: Enacting Systems Change: Precompetitive Collaboration to Address Persistent Global Problems, University of Michigan, https://doi.org/10.7302/1740, 2021. 5. Blackman, A. and Rivera, J.: Producer-level benefits of sustainability certification, Conserv. Biol., 25, 1176–1185, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2011.01774.x, 2011.
|
|