Best performances of visible–near-infrared models in soils with little carbonate – a field study in Switzerland
Author:
Oberholzer Simon, Summerauer LauraORCID, Steffens MarkusORCID, Ifejika Speranza Chinwe
Abstract
Abstract. Conventional laboratory analysis of soil properties is often expensive and requires much time if various soil properties are to be measured. Visual and near-infrared (vis–NIR) spectroscopy offers a complementary and cost-efficient way to gain a wide variety of soil information at high spatial and temporal resolutions. Yet, applying vis–NIR spectroscopy requires confidence in the prediction accuracy of the infrared models. In this study, we used soil data from six agricultural fields in eastern Switzerland and calibrated (i) field-specific (local) models and (ii) general models (combining all fields) for soil organic carbon (SOC), permanganate oxidizable carbon (POXC), total nitrogen (N), total carbon (C) and pH using partial least-squares regression. The 30 local models showed a ratio of performance to deviation (RPD) between 1.14 and 5.27, and the root mean square errors (RMSE) were between 1.07 and 2.43 g kg−1 for SOC, between 0.03 and 0.07 g kg−1 for POXC, between 0.09 and 0.14 g kg−1 for total N, between 1.29 and 2.63 g kg−1 for total C, and between 0.04 and 0.19 for pH. Two fields with high carbonate content and poor correlation between the target properties were responsible for six local models with a low performance (RPD < 2). Analysis of variable importance in projection, as well as of correlations between spectral variables and target soil properties, confirmed that high carbonate content masked absorption features for SOC. Field sites with low carbonate content can be combined with general models with only a limited loss in prediction accuracy compared to the field-specific models. On the other hand, for fields with high carbonate contents, the prediction accuracy substantially decreased in general models. Whether the combination of soils with high carbonate contents in one prediction model leads to satisfying prediction accuracies needs further investigation.
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Reference59 articles.
1. Allory, V., Cambou, A., Moulin, P., Schwartz, C., Cannavo, P., Vidal-Beaudet, L., and Barthes, B. G.: Quantification of soil organic carbon stock in urban soils using visible and near infrared reflectance spectroscopy (VNIRS) in situ or in laboratory conditions, Sci. Total Environ., 686, 764–773, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.05.192, 2019. 2. Alomar, S., Mireei, S. A., Hemmat, A., Masoumi, A. A., and Khademi, H.: Comparison of Vis/SWNIR and NIR spectrometers combined with different multivariate techniques for estimating soil fertility parameters of calcareous topsoil in an arid climate, Biosys. Eng., 201, 50–66, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2020.11.007, 2021. 3. Amare, T., Hergarten, C., Hurni, H., Wolfgramm, B., Yitaferu, B., and Selassie, Y. G.: Prediction of Soil Organic Carbon for Ethiopian Highlands Using Soil Spectroscopy, ISRN Soil Sci., 2013, 720589, https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/720589, 2013. 4. Angelopoulou, T., Balafoutis, A., Zalidis, G., and Bochtis, D.: From Laboratory to Proximal Sensing Spectroscopy for Soil Organic Carbon Estimation – A Review, Sustainability-Basel, 12, 443, https://doi.org/10.3390/su12020443, 2020. 5. Barra, I., Haefele, S. M., Sakrabani, R., and Kebede, F.: Soil spectroscopy with the use of chemometrics, machine learning and pre-processing techniques in soil diagnosis: Recent advances – A review, Trac.-Trend. Anal. Chem., 135, 116166, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trac.2020.116166, 2021.
|
|