Addressing soil data needs and data gaps in catchment-scale environmental modelling: the European perspective
Author:
Szabó BrigittaORCID, Kassai Piroska, Plunge SvajunasORCID, Nemes AttilaORCID, Braun Péter, Strauch MichaelORCID, Witing Felix, Mészáros JánosORCID, Čerkasova NataljaORCID
Abstract
Abstract. To effectively guide agricultural management planning strategies and policy, it is important to simulate water quantity and quality patterns and to quantify the impact of land use and climate change on soil functions, soil health, and hydrological and other underlying processes. Environmental models that depict alterations in surface and groundwater quality and quantity at the catchment scale require substantial input, particularly concerning movement and retention in the unsaturated zone. Over the past few decades, numerous soil information sources, containing structured data on diverse basic and advanced soil parameters, alongside innovative solutions to estimate missing soil data, have become increasingly available. This study aims to (i) catalogue open-source soil datasets and pedotransfer functions (PTFs) applicable in simulation studies across European catchments; (ii) evaluate the performance of selected PTFs; and (iii) present compiled R scripts proposing estimation solutions to address soil physical, hydraulic, and chemical data needs and gaps in catchment-scale environmental modelling in Europe. Our focus encompassed basic soil properties, bulk density, porosity, albedo, soil erodibility factor, field capacity, wilting point, available water capacity, saturated hydraulic conductivity, and phosphorus content. We aim to recommend widely supported data sources and pioneering prediction methods that maintain physical consistency and present them through streamlined workflows.
Funder
H2020 European Research Council Magyar Tudományos Akadémia
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Reference117 articles.
1. Abbaspour, K. C., AshrafVaghefi, S., Yang, H., and Srinivasan, R.: Global soil, landuse, evapotranspiration, historical and future weather databases for SWAT Applications, Sci. Data, 6, 263, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-019-0282-4, 2019. 2. Alexander, E. B.: Bulk Densities of California Soils in Relation to Other Soil Properties, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 44, 689–692, https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1980.03615995004400040005x, 1980. 3. Amorim, H. C. S., Hurtarte, L. C. C., Souza, I. F., and Zinn, Y. L.: C:N ratios of bulk soils and particle-size fractions: Global trends and major drivers, Geoderma, 425, 116026, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2022.116026, 2022. 4. Arnold, J. G., Kiniry, J. R., Srinivasan, R., Williams, J. R., Haney, E. B., and Neitsch, S. L.: Soil and Water Assessment Tool: Input/Output Documentation. Version 2012. TR-439, Texas Water Resources Institute, College Station, 1–654, https://swatplus.gitbook.io/io-docs/ (last access: 2 September 2024), 2012. 5. Assouline, S. and Or, D.: The concept of field capacity revisited: Defining intrinsic static and dynamic criteria for soil internal drainage dynamics, Water Resour. Res., 50, 4787–4802, https://doi.org/10.1002/2014WR015475, 2014.
|
|