On the effect of upwind emission controls on ozone in Sequoia National Park
-
Published:2018-12-04
Issue:23
Volume:18
Page:17061-17076
-
ISSN:1680-7324
-
Container-title:Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Atmos. Chem. Phys.
Author:
Buysse Claire E.,Munyan Jessica A.,Bailey Clara A.,Kotsakis Alexander,Sagona Jessica A.,Esperanza Annie,Pusede Sally E.
Abstract
Abstract. Ozone (O3) air pollution in Sequoia National Park (SNP) is among
the worst of any national park in the US. SNP is located on the western
slope of the Sierra Nevada Mountains downwind of the San Joaquin Valley
(SJV), which is home to numerous cities ranked in the top 10 most
O3-polluted in the US. Here, we investigate the influence of
emission controls in the SJV on O3 concentrations in SNP over a
12-year time period (2001–2012). We show that the export of nitrogen oxides
(NOx) from the SJV has played a larger role in driving high O3
in SNP than transport of O3. As a result, O3 in SNP has
been more responsive to NOx emission reductions than in
the upwind SJV city of Visalia, and O3 concentrations have
declined faster at a higher-elevation monitoring station in SNP than at a low-elevation site nearer to the
SJV. We report O3 trends by various
concentration metrics but do so separately for when environmental conditions
are conducive to plant O3 uptake and for when high O3 is
most common, which are time periods that occur at different times of day and
year. We find that precursor emission controls have been less effective at
reducing O3 concentrations in SNP in springtime, which is when
plant O3 uptake in Sierra Nevada forests has been previously
measured to be greatest. We discuss the implications of regulatory focus on
high O3 days in SJV cities for O3 concentration trends and
ecosystem impacts in SNP.
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Subject
Atmospheric Science
Reference104 articles.
1. Ainsworth, E. A., Yendrek, C. R., Sitch, S., Collins, W. J., and Emberson,
L. D.: The effects of tropospheric ozone on net primary productivity and
implications for climate change, Annu. Rev. Plant Biol., 63, 637–661,
https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-arplant-042110-103829, 2012. 2. American Lung Association:, State of the Air 2016:
available at: http://www.lung.org/our-initiatives/healthy-air/sota/ (last access: 27 September 2017), 2016. 3. Ashmore, M. R.: Assessing the future global impacts of ozone on vegetation,
Plant Cell Environ., 28, 949–964, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3040.2005.01341.x,
2005. 4. Bauer, M. R., Hultman, N. E., Panek, J. A., and Goldstein, A. H.: Ozone
deposition to a ponderosa pine plantation in the Sierra Nevada Mountains
(CA): a comparison of two different climatic years, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos.,
105, 22123–22136, https://doi.org/10.1029/2000JD900168, 2000. 5. Beaver, M. R., Clair, J. M. St., Paulot, F., Spencer, K. M., Crounse, J. D., LaFranchi, B. W.,
Min, K. E., Pusede, S. E., Wooldridge, P. J., Schade, G. W., Park, C., Cohen, R. C.,
and Wennberg, P. O.: Importance of biogenic precursors to the budget of organic
nitrates: observations of multifunctional organic nitrates by CIMS and TD-LIF
during BEARPEX 2009, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 5773–5785, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-5773-2012, 2012.
Cited by
9 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|