Cloud impacts on photochemistry: building a climatology of photolysis rates from the Atmospheric Tomography mission
-
Published:2018-11-28
Issue:22
Volume:18
Page:16809-16828
-
ISSN:1680-7324
-
Container-title:Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Atmos. Chem. Phys.
Author:
Hall Samuel R., Ullmann KirkORCID, Prather Michael J.ORCID, Flynn Clare M., Murray Lee T.ORCID, Fiore Arlene M.ORCID, Correa GustavoORCID, Strode Sarah A.ORCID, Steenrod Stephen D., Lamarque Jean-FrancoisORCID, Guth JonathanORCID, Josse Béatrice, Flemming JohannesORCID, Huijnen VincentORCID, Abraham N. LukeORCID, Archibald Alex T.ORCID
Abstract
Abstract. Measurements from actinic flux spectroradiometers on board the
NASA DC-8 during the Atmospheric Tomography (ATom) mission provide an
extensive set of statistics on how clouds alter photolysis rates (J values)
throughout the remote Pacific and Atlantic Ocean basins. J values control
tropospheric ozone and methane abundances, and thus clouds have been included
for more than three decades in tropospheric chemistry modeling. ATom made
four profiling circumnavigations of the troposphere capturing each of the
seasons during 2016–2018. This work examines J values from the Pacific
Ocean flights of the first deployment, but publishes the complete Atom-1 data
set (29 July to 23 August 2016). We compare the observed J values (every 3 s along flight track) with those calculated by nine global
chemistry–climate/transport models (globally gridded, hourly, for a
mid-August day). To compare these disparate data sets, we build a
commensurate statistical picture of the impact of clouds on J values using
the ratio of J-cloudy (standard, sometimes cloudy conditions) to J-clear
(artificially cleared of clouds). The range of modeled cloud effects is
inconsistently large but they fall into two distinct classes: (1) models with
large cloud effects showing mostly enhanced J values aloft and or
diminished at the surface and (2) models with small effects having nearly
clear-sky J values much of the time. The ATom-1 measurements generally
favor large cloud effects but are not precise or robust enough to point out
the best cloud-modeling approach. The models here have resolutions of 50–200 km
and thus reduce the occurrence of clear sky when averaging over grid
cells. In situ measurements also average scattered sunlight over a mixed
cloud field, but only out to scales of tens of kilometers. A primary uncertainty
remains in the role of clouds in chemistry, in particular, how models average
over cloud fields, and how such averages can simulate measurements.
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Subject
Atmospheric Science
Reference81 articles.
1. Atkinson, R., Baulch, D. L., Cox, R. A., Crowley, J. N., Hampson, R. F.,
Hynes, R. G., Jenkin, M. E., Rossi, M. J., and Troe, J.: Evaluated kinetic
and photochemical data for atmospheric chemistry: Volume I – gas phase
reactions of Ox, HOx, NOx and SOx species,
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 4, 1461–1738, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-4-1461-2004,
2004. 2. ATom: Measurements and modeling results from the NASA Atmospheric Tomography
Mission, available at: https://espoarchive.nasa.gov/archive/browse/atom
(last access: 23 November 2018),
https://doi.org/10.5067/Aircraft/ATom/TraceGas_Aerosol_Global_Distribution,
2017. 3. Barker, H. W.: Overlap of fractional cloud for radiation calculations in
GCMs: A global analysis using CloudSat and CALIPSO data, J. Geophys. Res.,
113, D00A01, https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JD009677, 2008a. 4. Barker, H. W.: Representing cloud overlap with an effective decorrelation
length: An assessment using CloudSat and CALIPSO data, J. Geophys. Res., 113,
D24205, https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JD010391, 2008b. 5. Barker, H. W., Jerg, M. P., Wehr, T., Kato, S., Donovan, D. P., and Hogan, R.
J.:
A 3D cloud-construction algorithm for the EarthCARE satellite mission. Quart.
J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 137, 1042–1058, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.824, 2011.
Cited by
37 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|