Evaluating cloud properties in an ensemble of regional online coupled models against satellite observations
-
Published:2018-10-22
Issue:20
Volume:18
Page:15183-15199
-
ISSN:1680-7324
-
Container-title:Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Atmos. Chem. Phys.
Author:
Baró Rocío, Jiménez-Guerrero PedroORCID, Stengel MartinORCID, Brunner DominikORCID, Curci GabrieleORCID, Forkel RenateORCID, Neal Lucy, Palacios-Peña LauraORCID, Savage NicholasORCID, Schaap Martijn, Tuccella Paolo, Denier van der Gon HugoORCID, Galmarini StefanoORCID
Abstract
Abstract. Online coupled meteorology–chemistry models permit the description of the
aerosol–radiation (ARI) and aerosol–cloud interactions (ACIs). The aim of this
work is to assess the representation of several cloud properties in
regional-scale coupled models when simulating the
climate–chemistry–cloud–radiation system. The evaluated simulations are
performed under the umbrella of the Air Quality Model Evaluation
International Initiative (AQMEII) Phase 2 and include ARI+ACI interactions.
Model simulations are evaluated against observational data from the European
Space Agency (ESA) Cloud_cci project. The results show an underestimation
(overestimation) of cloud fraction (CF) over land (sea) areas by the models.
Lower bias values are found in the ensemble mean. Cloud optical depth (COD)
and cloud ice water path (IWP) are generally underestimated over the whole
European domain. The cloud liquid water path (LWP) is broadly overestimated.
The temporal correlation suggests a generally positive correlation between
models and satellite observations. Finally, CF gives the best spatial
variability representation, whereas COD, IWP, and LWP show less capacity. The
differences found can be attributed to differences in the microphysics
schemes used; for instance, the number of ice hydrometeors and the
prognostic/diagnostic treatment of the LWP are relevant.
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Subject
Atmospheric Science
Reference65 articles.
1. Alapaty, K., Mathur, R., Pleim, J., Hogrefe, C., Rao, S. T., Ramaswamy, V.,
Galmarini, S., Schaap, M., Makar, P., Vautard, R., Makar, P., Baklanov, A., Kallos, G., Vogel , B., Hogrefe, C., and Sokhi, R.: New Directions:
Understanding interactions of air quality and climate change at regional scales, Atmos. Environ., 49, 419–421, 2012. 2. Albrecht, B. A.: Aerosols, cloud microphysics, and fractional cloudiness,
Science, 245, 1227–1230, 1989. a 3. Avey, L., Garrett, T. J., and Stohl, A.: Evaluation of the aerosol indirect
effect using satellite, tracer transport model, and aircraft data from the
International Consortium for Atmospheric Research on Transport and
Transformation, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 112, https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JD007581, 2007. a 4. Baklanov, A., Korsholm, U., Woetmann, N., and Gross, A.: On-line coupling of
chemistry and aerosols into meteorological models: advantages and
prospective, Tech. rep., Project no. 516099, Danish Meteorological Institute
(DMI), Copenhagen, 2008. a 5. Baró, R., Jiménez-Guerrero, P., Balzarini, A., Curci, G., Forkel, R.,
Grell, G., Hirtl, M., Honzak, L., Langer, M., Pérez, J. L., Pirovano, G., San José, R., Tuccella, P., Werhahn, J., and Zabkar, R.:
Sensitivity analysis of the microphysics scheme in WRF-Chem contributions to AQMEII phase 2, Atmos. Environ., 115, 620–629, 2015. a, b, c, d, e
Cited by
7 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|