Abstract
Abstract. Since the advent of dual-polarization radar technology, many
studies have been conducted to determine the extent to which the
differential reflectivity (ZDR) and specific differential phase shift (KDP)
add benefits to estimating rain rates (R) compared to reflectivity (Z)
alone. It has been previously noted that this new technology provides
significant improvement to rain-rate estimation, primarily for ranges within
125 km of the radar. Beyond this range, it is unclear as to whether the
National Weather Service (NWS) conventional R(Z)-convective algorithm
is superior, as little research has investigated radar precipitation estimate performance
at larger ranges. The current study investigates the performance of three
radars – St. Louis (KLSX), Kansas City (KEAX), and Springfield (KSGF), MO –
with 15 tipping bucket gauges serving as ground truth to the radars. With
over 300 h of precipitation data being analyzed for the current study, it
was found that, in general, performance degraded with range beyond,
approximately, 150 km from each of the radars. Probability of detection (PoD) in
addition to bias values decreased, while the false alarm rates increased as
range increased. Bright-band contamination was observed to play a potential
role as large increases in the absolute bias and overall error values near
120 km for the cool season and 150 km in the warm season. Furthermore,
upwards of 60 % of the total error was due to precipitation being falsely
estimated, while 20 % of the total error was due to missed precipitation.
Correlation coefficient values increased by as much as 0.4 when these
instances were removed from the analyses (i.e., hits only). Overall, due to
the lowest normalized standard error (NSE) of less than 1.0, a National Severe
Storms Laboratory (NSSL) R(Z,ZDR) equation was determined to be the most
robust, while a R(ZDR,KDP) algorithm recorded NSE values as high as 5. The
addition of dual-polarized technology was shown to estimate
quantitative precipitation estimates (QPEs) better
than the conventional equation. The
analyses further our understanding of the strengths and limitations of the
Next Generation Radar (NEXRAD) system overall and from a seasonal perspective.
Funder
National Science Foundation
Subject
General Earth and Planetary Sciences,General Engineering,General Environmental Science
Reference67 articles.
1. AgEBB (Agricultural Electronic Bulletin Board):
Missouri Mesonet, available at: http://agebb.missouri.edu/weather/stations/, last access:
February 2017.
2. Alaya, M. A., Ourda, T. B. M. J., and Chebana, F.: Non-Gaussian spatiotemporal
simulation of multisite precipitation: Downscaling framework, Clim. Dynam., 50, 1–15, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-017-3578-0, 2017.
3. Anagnostou, M. N., Anagnostou, E. N., Vulpiani, G., Montopoli, M., Marzano,
F. S., and Vivekanandan, J.: Evaluation of X-band polarimetric-radar estimates of
drop-size distributions from coincident S-band polarimetric estimated and
measured raindrop spectra, IEEE T. Geosci. Remote, 46, 3067–3075, 2008.
4. Bechini, R., Baldini, L., Cremonini, R., and Gorgucci, E.: Differential
reflectivity calibration for operational radars, J. Atmos. Ocean. Tech., 25, 1542–1555, 2009.
5. Berne, A. and Krajewski, W. F.: Radar for hydrology: Unfulfilled promise or
unrecognized potential?, Adv. Water Resour., 51, 357–366, 2013.