Abstract
Abstract. Drydown periods that follow precipitation events provide an
opportunity to assess controls on soil evaporation on a continental scale. We
use SMAP (Soil Moisture Active Passive) observations and Noah simulations
from drydown periods to quantify the role of soil moisture, potential
evaporation, vegetation cover, and soil texture on soil drying rates. Rates
are determined using finite differences over intervals of 1 to 3 days. In the
Noah model, the drying rates are a good approximation of direct soil
evaporation rates, and our work suggests that SMAP-observed drying is also
predominantly affected by direct soil evaporation. Data cover the domain of
the North American Land Data Assimilation System Phase 2 and span the first
1.8 years of SMAP's operation. Drying of surface soil moisture observed by SMAP is faster than that
simulated by Noah. SMAP drying is fastest when surface soil moisture levels
are high, potential evaporation is high, and when vegetation cover is low.
Soil texture plays a minor role in SMAP drying rates. Noah simulations show
similar responses to soil moisture and potential evaporation, but vegetation
has a minimal effect and soil texture has a much larger effect compared to
SMAP. When drying rates are normalized by potential evaporation, SMAP
observations and Noah simulations both show that increases in vegetation
cover lead to decreases in evaporative efficiency from the surface soil.
However, the magnitude of this effect simulated by Noah is much weaker than
that determined from SMAP observations.
Subject
General Earth and Planetary Sciences,General Engineering,General Environmental Science
Reference59 articles.
1. Allen, R.: Using the FAO-56 dual crop coefficient method over an irrigated
region as part of an evapotranspiration intercomparison study, J. Hydrol.,
229, 27–41, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1694(99)00194-8, 2000.
2. Betts, A. K., Chen, F., Mitchell, K. E., and Janjić, Z. I.: Assessment of
the Land Surface and Boundary Layer Models in Two Operational Versions of the
NCEP Eta Model Using FIFE Data, Mon. Weather Rev., 125, 2896–2916,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(1997)125<2896:AOTLSA>2.0.CO;2, 1997.
3. Breshears, D. D., Nyhan, J. W., Heil, C. E., and Wilcox, B. P.: Effects of
Woody Plants on Microclimate in a Semiarid Woodland: Soil Temperature and
Evaporation in Canopy and Intercanopy Patches, Int. J. Plant Sci., 159,
1010–1017, https://doi.org/10.1086/314083, 1998.
4. Campbell, G. and Norman, J.: Introduction to Enviromental Biophysics, 2nd
ed., Springer-Verlag, New York, 1998.
5. Campbell, G. S.: Simple Method for Determining Unsaturated Conductivity from
Moisture Retention Data, Soil Sci., 117, 311–314, 1974.
Cited by
49 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献