Relationship between wind observation accuracy and the ascending node of the sun-synchronous orbit for the Aeolus-type spaceborne Doppler wind lidar
-
Published:2021-07-07
Issue:7
Volume:14
Page:4787-4803
-
ISSN:1867-8548
-
Container-title:Atmospheric Measurement Techniques
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Atmos. Meas. Tech.
Author:
Zhang ChuanliangORCID, Sun XuejinORCID, Lu Wen, Shi Yingni, Dou Naiying, Li Shaohui
Abstract
Abstract. The launch and operation of the first spaceborne Doppler wind
lidar (DWL), Aeolus, is of great significance for observing the global wind
field. Aeolus operates on a sun-synchronous dawn–dusk orbit to minimize the
negative impact of solar background radiation (SBR) on wind observation
accuracy. Future spaceborne DWLs may not operate on sun-synchronous
dawn–dusk orbits due to their observational purposes. The impact of the local
time of ascending node (LTAN) crossing of sun-synchronous orbits on the wind
observation accuracy was studied in this paper by proposing two given
Aeolus-type spaceborne DWLs operating on the sun-synchronous orbits with
LTANs of 15:00 and 12:00 LT. On these two new orbits, the increments of the
averaged SBR received by the new spaceborne DWLs range from 39 to 56 mW m−2 sr−1 nm−1 under cloud-free skies
near the summer and winter solstices, which will lead to uncertainties of
0.19 and 0.27 m s−1 in the increment of the averaged Rayleigh channel wind
observations for 15:00 and 12:00 LT orbits using the instrument parameters of
Aeolus with 30 measurements per observation and 20 laser pulses per
measurement. This demonstrates that Aeolus operating on the sun-synchronous
dawn–dusk orbit is the optimal observation scenario, and the random error
caused by the SBR will be larger on other sun-synchronous orbits. Increasing
the laser pulse energy of the new spaceborne DWLs is used to lower the wind
observation uncertainties, and a method to quantitatively design the laser
pulse energy according to the specific accuracy requirements is proposed in
this study based on the relationship between the signal-to-noise ratio and
the uncertainty of the response function of the Rayleigh channel. The laser
pulse energies of the two new spaceborne DWLs should be set to 70 mJ based
on the statistical results obtained using the method. The other instrument
parameters should be the same as those of Aeolus. Based on the proposed
parameters, the accuracies of about 77.19 % and 74.71 % of the bins of
the two new spaceborne DWLs would meet the accuracy requirements of the
European Space Agency (ESA) for Aeolus. These values are very close to the
76.46 % accuracy of an Aeolus-type spaceborne DWL when it is free of the
impact of the SBR. Moreover, the averaged uncertainties of the two new
spaceborne DWLs are 2.62 and 2.69 m s−1, which perform better than that of
Aeolus (2.77 m s−1).
Funder
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Subject
Atmospheric Science
Reference30 articles.
1. Amiridis, V., Marinou, E., Tsekeri, A., Wandinger, U., Schwarz, A., Giannakaki, E., Mamouri, R., Kokkalis, P., Binietoglou, I., Solomos, S., Herekakis, T., Kazadzis, S., Gerasopoulos, E., Proestakis, E., Kottas, M., Balis, D., Papayannis, A., Kontoes, C., Kourtidis, K., Papagiannopoulos, N., Mona, L., Pappalardo, G., Le Rille, O., and Ansmann, A.: LIVAS: a 3-D multi-wavelength aerosol/cloud database based on CALIPSO and EARLINET, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 7127–7153, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-7127-2015, 2015 (data available at: https://sds-was.aemet.es/projects-research/livas-monthly-dust-aod/, last access: 2 July 2021). 2. Baars, H., Geiß, A., Wandinger, U., Herzog, A., Engelmann, R., Bühl,
J., Radenz, M., Seifert, P., Althausen, D., Heese, B., Ansmann, A., Martin,
A., Leinweber, R., Lehmann, V., Weissmann, M., Cress, A., Filioglou, M.,
Komppula, M., and Reitebuch, O.: First results from the German CAL/VAL
activities for Aeolus, The 29th International Laser Radar Conference, Hefei,
China, 24–28 June 2019, 2019. 3. Compo, G. P., Whitaker, J. S., Sardeshmukh, P. D., Matsui, N., Allan, R. J.,
Yin, X., Gleason, B. E., Vose, R. S., Rutledge, G., Bessemoulin, P.,
Brönnimann, S., Burnet, M., Crouthamel, R. I., Grant, A. N., Groisman,
P. Y., Jones, P. D., Kruk, M. C., Kruger, A. C., Marshall, G. J., Maugeri,
M., Mok, H. Y., Nordli, Ø., Ross, T. F., Trigo, R. M., Wang, X. L.,
Woodruff, S. D., and Worley, S. J.: The Twentieth Century Reanalysis Project,
Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 137, 1–28,
https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.776, 2011 (data available at: https://psl.noaa.gov/data/20thC_Rean/, last access: 2 July 2021). 4. Emde, C., Buras-Schnell, R., Kylling, A., Mayer, B., Gasteiger, J., Hamann, U., Kylling, J., Richter, B., Pause, C., Dowling, T., and Bugliaro, L.: The libRadtran software package for radiative transfer calculations (version 2.0.1), Geosci. Model Dev., 9, 1647–1672, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-1647-2016, 2016. 5. Eyre, J.: Requirements for observational data: the rolling review of requirements, European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts, Reading, British, Open File Rep., available at: http://www.wmo-sat.info/oscar/requirements (last access: 22 June 2021), 2018.
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|