Towards a sector-specific CO∕CO2 emission ratio: satellite-based observations of CO release from steel production in Germany
-
Published:2024-07-05
Issue:13
Volume:24
Page:7609-7621
-
ISSN:1680-7324
-
Container-title:Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Atmos. Chem. Phys.
Author:
Schneising OliverORCID, Buchwitz MichaelORCID, Reuter MaximilianORCID, Weimer MichaelORCID, Bovensmann Heinrich, Burrows John P.ORCID, Bösch HartmutORCID
Abstract
Abstract. Global crude steel production is expected to continue to increase in the coming decades to meet the demands of the growing world population. Currently, the dominant steelmaking technology worldwide is the conventional highly CO2-intensive blast furnace–basic oxygen furnace production route (also known as the Linz–Donawitz process), which uses iron ore as raw material and coke as a reducing agent. As a result, large quantities of special gases that are rich in carbon monoxide (CO) are by-products of the various stages of the steelmaking process. Given the challenges associated with satellite-based estimates of carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions at the scale of emitting installations due to significant background levels, co-emitted CO may serve as a valuable indicator of the carbon footprint of steel plants. We show that regional CO release from steel production sites can be monitored from space using 5 years of measurements (2018–2022) from the TROPOspheric Monitoring Instrument (TROPOMI) on board the Sentinel-5 Precursor satellite, benefiting from its relatively high spatial resolution and daily global coverage. We analyse all German steel plants with blast furnaces and basic oxygen furnaces and obtain associated CO emissions in the range of 50–400 kt yr−1 per site. A comparison with the respective CO2 emissions on the level of emitting installations available from emissions trading data of the European Union Emissions Trading System yields a linear relationship with a sector-specific CO/CO2 emission ratio for the analysed steelworks of 3.24 % [2.73–3.89; 1σ], suggesting the feasibility of using CO as a proxy for CO2 emissions from comparable steel production sites. An evaluation at other steel production sites indicates that the derived CO/CO2 emission ratio is also representative of other highly optimised state-of-the-art Linz–Donawitz steelworks outside Germany and that the emission ratio is potentially valuable for estimating sector-specific CO2 emissions from remotely sensed CO emissions, provided that the underlying CO emission estimate is not affected by other sources.
Funder
European Space Agency Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Reference34 articles.
1. Backes, J. G., Suer, J., Pauliks, N., Neugebauer, S., and Traverso, M.: Life Cycle Assessment of an Integrated Steel Mill Using Primary Manufacturing Data: Actual Environmental Profile, Sustainability, 13, 3443, https://doi.org/10.3390/su13063443, 2021. a 2. Borsdorff, T., aan de Brugh, J., Schneider, A., Lorente, A., Birk, M., Wagner, G., Kivi, R., Hase, F., Feist, D. G., Sussmann, R., Rettinger, M., Wunch, D., Warneke, T., and Landgraf, J.: Improving the TROPOMI CO data product: update of the spectroscopic database and destriping of single orbits, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 12, 5443–5455, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-12-5443-2019, 2019. a 3. Borsdorff, T., Campos, T., Kille, N., Zarzana, K. J., Volkamer, R., and Landgraf, J.: Vertical information of CO from TROPOMI total column measurements in context of the CAMS-IFS data assimilation scheme, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 16, 3027–3038, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-3027-2023, 2023. a 4. Bovensmann, H., Burrows, J. P., Buchwitz, M., Frerick, J., Noël, S., Rozanov, V. V., Chance, K. V., and Goede, A. P. H.: SCIAMACHY – Mission Objectives and Measurement Modes, J. Atmos. Sci., 56, 127–150, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1999)056<0127:SMOAMM>2.0.CO;2, 1999. a 5. Burchart-Korol, D.: Life cycle assessment of steel production in Poland: a case study, J. Clean. Prod., 54, 235–243, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.04.031, 2013. a, b
|
|