Author:
Peranginangin N. P.,Richards B. K.,Steenhuis T. S.
Abstract
Abstract. Accurate soil water sampling is needed for monitoring of pesticide leaching through the vadose zone, especially in soils with significant preferential flowpaths. We assessed the effectiveness of wick and gravity pan lysimeters as well as ceramic cups (installed 45–60 cm deep) in strongly-structured silty clay loam (Hudson series) and weakly-structured fine sandy loam (Arkport series) soils. Simulated rainfall (10–14 cm in 4 d, approximately equal to a 10-yr, 24 h storm) was applied following concurrent application of agronomic rates (0.2 g m−2) of atrazine (6-chloro-N2-ethyl-N4-isopropyl-1,3,5-triazine-2,4-diamine) and 2,4-D (2,4-dichloro-phenoxy-acetic acid) immediately following application of a chloride tracer (22–44 g m−2). Preferential flow mechanisms were observed in both soils, with herbicide and tracer mobility greater than would be predicted by uniform flow. Preferential flow was more dominant in the Hudson soil, with earlier breakthroughs observed. Mean wick and gravity pan sampler percolate concentrations at 60 cm depth ranged from 96 to 223 μg L−1 for atrazine and 54 to 78 μg L−1 for 2,4-D at the Hudson site, and from 7 to 22 μg L−1 for atrazine and 0.5 to 2.8 μg L−1 for 2,4-D at the Arkport site. Gravity and wick pan lysimeters had comparably good collection efficiencies at elevated soil moisture levels, whereas wick pan samplers performed better at lower moisture contents. Cup samplers performed poorly with wide variations in collections and solute concentrations.
Reference80 articles.
1. Akhtar, M. S., Richards, B. K., Medrano, P. A., deGroot, M., and Steenhuis, T. S.: Are dissolved phosphorus losses in drainage water from undisturbed soil cores related to adsorption strength, flow rate, or soil structure?, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 67, 458–470, 2003.
2. Akhtar, M. S., Steenhuis, T. S., Richards, B. K., and McBride, M. B.: Chloride and lithium transport in large arrays of undisturbed silt loam and sandy loam soil columns, Vadose Zone J., 2, 715–727, 2003.
3. APHA/AWWA/WPCF: Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater. 20th ed. American Public Health Association, American Water Works Association, Water Pollution Control Federation, Washington, DC, 1998.
4. Bailey, N. O: Solute flux into porous cup samplers near the water table. Ph.D. dissertation. Cornell Univ., Ithaca, NY (Dissertation Abstr. 90-27005), 1990.
5. Barbee, G. C. and Brown, K. W.: Comparison between suction and free-drainage soil suction samplers, Soil Sci., 141, 149–154, 1986.
Cited by
6 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献