A new method (M<sup>3</sup>Fusion v1) for combining observations and multiple model output for an improved estimate of the global surface ozone distribution
-
Published:2019-03-12
Issue:3
Volume:12
Page:955-978
-
ISSN:1991-9603
-
Container-title:Geoscientific Model Development
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Geosci. Model Dev.
Author:
Chang Kai-LanORCID, Cooper Owen R., West J. JasonORCID, Serre Marc L.ORCID, Schultz Martin G.ORCID, Lin MeiyunORCID, Marécal Virginie, Josse Béatrice, Deushi Makoto, Sudo KengoORCID, Liu Junhua, Keller Christoph A.
Abstract
Abstract. We have developed a new statistical approach (M3Fusion) for combining
surface ozone observations from thousands of monitoring sites around the
world with the output from multiple atmospheric chemistry models to produce a
global surface ozone distribution with greater accuracy than can be provided
by any individual model. The ozone observations from 4766 monitoring sites
were provided by the Tropospheric Ozone Assessment Report (TOAR) surface
ozone database, which contains the world's largest collection of surface
ozone metrics. Output from six models was provided by the participants of the
Chemistry-Climate Model Initiative (CCMI) and NASA's Global Modeling and
Assimilation Office (GMAO). We analyze the 6-month maximum of the maximum
daily 8 h average ozone value (DMA8) for relevance to ozone health impacts.
We interpolate the irregularly spaced observations onto a fine-resolution
grid by using integrated nested Laplace approximations and compare the ozone
field to each model in each world region. This method allows us to produce a
global surface ozone field based on TOAR observations, which we then use to
select the combination of global models with the greatest skill in each of
eight world regions; models with greater skill in a particular region are
given higher weight. This blended model product is bias corrected within
2∘ of observation locations to produce the final fused surface ozone
product. We show that our fused product has an improved mean squared error
compared to the simple multi-model ensemble mean, which is biased high in
most regions of the world.
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Reference98 articles.
1. Adachi, Y., Yukimoto, S., Deushi, M., Obata, A., andTaichu. Y. Tanaka, H. N.,
Hosaka, M., Sakami, T., Yoshimura, H., Hirabara, M., Shindo, E., Tsujino, H.,
Mizuta, R., Yabu, S., Koshiro, T., Ose, T., and Kitoh, A.: Basic performance
of a new earth system model of the Meteorological Research Institute
(MRI-ESM1), Pap. Meteorol. Geophys, 64, 1–18, https://doi.org/10.2467/mripapers.64.1,
2013. a 2. Anenberg, S. C., Horowitz, L. W., Tong, D. Q., and West, J. J.: An estimate
of the global burden of anthropogenic ozone and fine particulate matter on
premature human mortality using atmospheric modeling, Environ. Health Persp.,
118, 1189–1195, https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.0901220, 2010. a 3. Banerjee, A., Dunson, D. B., and Tokdar, S. T.: Efficient Gaussian process
regression for large datasets, Biometrika, 100, 75–89,
https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/ass068, 2012. a, b 4. Berrocal, V. J., Gelfand, A. E., and Holland, D. M.: Space-time data fusion
under error in computer model output: An application to modeling air quality,
Biometrics, 68, 837–848, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0420.2011.01725.x, 2012. a 5. Bolin, D. and Lindgren, F.: Spatial models generated by nested stochastic
partial differential equations, with an application to global ozone mapping,
Ann. Appl. Stat., 5, 523–550, https://doi.org/10.1214/10-AOAS383, 2011. a, b
Cited by
23 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|