Performance and sensitivity of column-wise and pixel-wise methane retrievals for imaging spectrometers
-
Published:2023-12-20
Issue:24
Volume:16
Page:6065-6074
-
ISSN:1867-8548
-
Container-title:Atmospheric Measurement Techniques
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Atmos. Meas. Tech.
Author:
Ayasse Alana K., Cusworth DanielORCID, O'Neill Kelly, Fisk Justin, Thorpe Andrew K.ORCID, Duren Riley
Abstract
Abstract. Strong methane point source emissions generate large atmospheric concentrations that can be detected and quantified with infrared remote sensing and retrieval algorithms. Two standard and widely used retrieval algorithms for one class of observing platform, imaging spectrometers, include pixel-wise and column-wise approaches. In this study, we assess the performance of both approaches using the airborne imaging spectrometer (Global Airborne Observatory) observations of two extensive controlled-release experiments. We find that the column-wise retrieval algorithm is sensitive to the flight line length and can have a systematic low bias with short flight lines, which is not present in the pixel-wise retrieval algorithm. However, the pixel-wise retrieval is very computationally expensive, and the column-wise retrieval algorithms can produce good results when the flight line length is sufficiently long. Lastly, this study examines the methane plume detection performance of the Global Airborne Observatory with a column-wise retrieval algorithm and finds minimum detection limits of between 9 of 10 kg h−1 and 90 % probability of detection between 10 and 45 kg h−1. These results present a framework of rules for guiding proper concentration retrieval selection given conditions at the time of observation in order to ensure robust detection and quantification.
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Subject
Atmospheric Science
Reference26 articles.
1. Ayasse, A. K., Thorpe, A. K., Roberts, D. A., Funk, C. C., Dennison, P. E., Frankenberg, C., Steffke, A., and Aubrey, A. D.: Evaluating the effects of surface properties on methane retrievals using a synthetic airborne visible/infrared imaging spectrometer next generation (AVIRIS-NG) image, Remote Sens. Environ., 215, 386–397, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2018.06.018, 2018. 2. Carbon Mapper: Map, Carbon Mapper, OpenStreetMap [data set], https://data.carbonmapper.org (last access: 20 April 2022), 2021. 3. Conrad, B. M., Tyner, D. R., and Johnson, M. R.: Robust probabilities of detection and quantification uncertainty for aerial methane detection: Examples for three airborne technologies, Remote Sens. Environ., 288, 113499, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2023.113499, 2023. 4. Cusworth, D. H., Jacob, D. J., Varon, D. J., Chan Miller, C., Liu, X., Chance, K., Thorpe, A. K., Duren, R. M., Miller, C. E., Thompson, D. R., Frankenberg, C., Guanter, L., and Randles, C. A.: Potential of next-generation imaging spectrometers to detect and quantify methane point sources from space, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 12, 5655–5668, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-12-5655-2019, 2019. 5. Cusworth, D. H., Duren, R. M., Yadav, V., Thorpe, A. K., Verhulst, K., Sander, S., Hopkins, F., Rafiq, T., and Miller, C. E.: Synthesis of methane observations across scales: Strategies for deploying a multitiered observing network, Geophys. Res. Lett., 47, e2020GL087869, https://doi.org/10.1029/2020gl087869, 2020.
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|