Methane emissions from an oil sands tailings pond: a quantitative comparison of fluxes derived by different methods
-
Published:2021-03-08
Issue:3
Volume:14
Page:1879-1892
-
ISSN:1867-8548
-
Container-title:Atmospheric Measurement Techniques
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Atmos. Meas. Tech.
Author:
You YuanORCID, Staebler Ralf M.ORCID, Moussa Samar G., Beck James, Mittermeier Richard L.
Abstract
Abstract. Tailings ponds in the Alberta oil sands region are significant sources of fugitive emissions of methane to the atmosphere, but detailed knowledge on
spatial and temporal variabilities is lacking due to limitations of the methods deployed under current regulatory compliance monitoring programs. To
develop more robust and representative methods for quantifying fugitive emissions, three micrometeorological flux methods (eddy covariance,
gradient, and inverse dispersion) were applied along with traditional flux chambers to determine fluxes over a 5-week period. Eddy covariance flux
measurements provided the benchmark. A method is presented to directly calculate stability-corrected eddy diffusivities that can be applied to
vertical gas profiles for gradient flux estimation. Gradient fluxes were shown to agree with eddy covariance within 18 %, while inverse
dispersion model flux estimates were 30 % lower. Fluxes were shown to have only a minor diurnal cycle (15 % variability) and were weakly
dependent on wind speed, air, and water surface temperatures. Flux chambers underestimated the fluxes by 64 % in this particular campaign. The
results show that the larger footprint together with high temporal resolution of micrometeorological flux measurement methods may result in more
robust estimates of the pond greenhouse gas emissions.
Funder
Natural Resources Canada Environment and Climate Change Canada
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Subject
Atmospheric Science
Reference56 articles.
1. Alberta Environment and Parks:
Quantification of area fugitive emissions at oil sands mines,
available at: https://open.alberta.ca/publications/9781460145814 (last access: 17 October 2020), 2019. 2. Baray, S., Darlington, A., Gordon, M., Hayden, K. L., Leithead, A., Li, S.-M., Liu, P. S. K., Mittermeier, R. L., Moussa, S. G., O'Brien, J., Staebler, R., Wolde, M., Worthy, D., and McLaren, R.: Quantification of methane sources in the Athabasca Oil Sands Region of Alberta by aircraft mass balance, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 7361–7378, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-7361-2018, 2018. 3. Bari, M. A. and Kindzierski, W. B.:
Ambient volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in communities of the Athabasca oil sands region: Sources and screening health risk assessment,
Environ. Pollut.,
235, 602–614, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2017.12.065, 2018. 4. Bolinius, D. J., Jahnke, A., and MacLeod, M.: Comparison of eddy covariance and modified Bowen ratio methods for measuring gas fluxes and implications for measuring fluxes of persistent organic pollutants, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 5315–5322, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-5315-2016, 2016. 5. Covey, K. R. and Megonigal, J. P.:
Methane production and emissions in trees and forests,
New Phytol.,
222, 35–51, https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.15624, 2019.
Cited by
25 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|