Primary and secondary sources of formaldehyde in urban atmospheres: Houston Texas region
-
Published:2012-04-05
Issue:7
Volume:12
Page:3273-3288
-
ISSN:1680-7324
-
Container-title:Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Atmos. Chem. Phys.
Author:
Parrish D. D.,Ryerson T. B.,Mellqvist J.,Johansson J.,Fried A.,Richter D.,Walega J. G.,Washenfelder R. A.,de Gouw J. A.,Peischl J.,Aikin K. C.,McKeen S. A.,Frost G. J.,Fehsenfeld F. C.,Herndon S. C.
Abstract
Abstract. We evaluate the rates of secondary production and primary emission of formaldehyde (CH2O) from petrochemical industrial facilities and on-road vehicles in the Houston Texas region. This evaluation is based upon ambient measurements collected during field studies in 2000, 2006 and 2009. The predominant CH2O source (92 ± 4% of total) is secondary production formed during the atmospheric oxidation of highly reactive volatile organic compounds (HRVOCs) emitted from the petrochemical facilities. Smaller contributions are primary emissions from these facilities (4 ± 2%), and secondary production (~3%) and primary emissions (~1%) from vehicles. The primary emissions from both sectors are well quantified by current emission inventories. Since secondary production dominates, control efforts directed at primary CH2O emissions cannot address the large majority of CH2O sources in the Houston area, although there may still be a role for such efforts. Ongoing efforts to control alkene emissions from the petrochemical facilities, as well as volatile organic compound emissions from the motor vehicle fleet, will effectively reduce the CH2O concentrations in the Houston region. We do not address other emission sectors, such as off-road mobile sources or secondary formation from biogenic hydrocarbons. Previous analyses based on correlations between ambient concentrations of CH2O and various marker species have suggested much larger primary emissions of CH2O, but those results neglect confounding effects of dilution and loss processes, and do not demonstrate the causes of the observed correlations. Similar problems must be suspected in any source apportionment analysis of secondary species based upon correlations of ambient concentrations of pollutants.
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Subject
Atmospheric Science
Reference52 articles.
1. Anderson, L. G., Lanning, J. A., Barrell, R., Miyagishima, J., Jones, R. H., and Wolfe, P.: Sources and sinks of formaldehyde and acetaldehyde: An analysis of Denver's ambient concentration data, Atmos. Environ., 3, 2113–2123, 1996. 2. Baker, A. K., Beyersdorf, A. J., Doezema, L. A., Katzenstein, A., Meinardi, S., Simpson, I. J., Blake, D. R., and Rowland, F. S.: Measurements of nonmethane hydrocarbons in 28 United States cities, Atmos. Environ., 42, 170–182, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2007.09.007, 2008. 3. Ban-Weiss, G. A., McLaughlin, J. P., Harley, R. A., Kean, A. J., Grosjean, E., and Grosjean, D.: Carbonyl and nitrogen dioxide emissions from gasoline- and diesel-powered motor vehicles, {Environ. Sci. Technol.}{, }42, 3944–3950, 2008. 4. Baylor University: Analysis of airborne data collected during 2006 to characterize HCHO emissions and sources in the Houston area, Final Report Project H-103B, Texas Environmental Research Consortium: Houston, TX, 2009. 5. Bevington, P. R.: Data reduction error analysis for the physical sciences, McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York, 1969.
Cited by
154 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|