Comparison of surface-wave techniques to estimate S- and P-wave velocity models from active seismic data
-
Published:2024-03-14
Issue:3
Volume:15
Page:367-386
-
ISSN:1869-9529
-
Container-title:Solid Earth
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Solid Earth
Author:
Khosro Anjom Farbod, Adler Frank, Socco Laura ValentinaORCID
Abstract
Abstract. The acquisition of seismic exploration data in remote locations presents several logistical and economic criticalities. The irregular distribution of sources and/or receivers facilitates seismic acquisition operations in these areas. A convenient approach is to deploy nodal receivers on a regular grid and to use sources only in accessible locations, creating an irregular source–receiver layout. It is essential to evaluate, adapt, and verify processing workflows, specifically for near-surface velocity model estimation using surface-wave analysis, when working with these types of datasets. In this study, we applied three surface-wave techniques (i.e., wavelength–depth (W/D) method, laterally constrained inversion (LCI), and surface-wave tomography (SWT)) to a large-scale 3D dataset obtained from a hard-rock site using the irregular source–receiver acquisition method. The methods were fine-tuned for the data obtained from hard-rock sites, which typically exhibit a low signal-to-noise ratio. The wavelength–depth method is a data transformation method that is based on a relationship between skin depth and surface-wave wavelength and provides both S- and P-wave velocity (Vs and Vp) models. We used Poisson's ratios estimated through the wavelength–depth method to constrain the laterally constrained inversion and surface-wave tomography and to retrieve both Vs and Vp also from these methods. The pseudo-3D Vs and Vp models were obtained down to 140 m depth over an area of approximately 900 × 1500 m2. The estimated models from the methods matched the geological information available for the site. A difference of less than 6 % was observed between the estimated Vs models from the three methods, whereas this value was 7.1 % for the retrieved Vp models. The methods were critically compared in terms of resolution and efficiency, which provides valuable insights into the potential of surface-wave analysis for estimating near-surface models at hard-rock sites.
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Reference55 articles.
1. Auken, E. and Christiansen, A. V.: Layered and laterally constrained 2D inversion of resistivity data, Geophysics, 69, 752–761, https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1759461, 2004. 2. Auken, E., Christiansen, A. V., Jacobsen, B. H., Foged, N., and Sorensen, K. I.: Piecewise 1D laterally constrained inversion of resistivity data, Geophys. Prospect., 53, 497–506, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2478.2005.00486.x, 2005. 3. Badal, J., Chen, Y., Chourak, M., and Stankiewicz, J.: S-wave velocity images of the Dead Sea Basin provided by ambient seismic noise, J. Asian Earth Sci., 75, 26–35, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jseaes.2013.06.017, 2013. 4. Bao, X., Song, X., and Li, J.: High-resolution lithospheric structure beneath Mainland China from ambient noise and earthquake surface-wave tomography, Earth Planet. Sc. Lett., 417, 132–141, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2015.02.024, 2015. 5. Beaty, K. S., Schmitt, D. R., and Sacchi, M.: Simulated annealing inversion of multimode Rayleigh wave dispersion curves for geological structure, Geophys. J. Int., 151, 622–631, https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-246X.2002.01809.x, 2002.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|