Effects of different floor materials on the welfare and behaviour of slow- and fast-growing broilers
-
Published:2019-06-14
Issue:1
Volume:62
Page:335-344
-
ISSN:2363-9822
-
Container-title:Archives Animal Breeding
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Arch. Anim. Breed.
Author:
Çavuşoğlu Enver,Petek Metin
Abstract
Abstract. Litter quality and fast growth rate are the two main issues in broiler
welfare. This study aimed to evaluate the effects of genotype and floor
material on broiler welfare and behaviour. In the study, slow-growing
(Hubbard JA57) and fast-growing (Ross 308) broilers on a slatted floor and
deep litter were used; there were four main groups (2 genotype × 2
housing) and each treatment group consisted of 5 replicates. Each
replicate group consisted of 10 male chicks, and 200 birds were used in total.
The experiment lasted for 8 weeks. The welfare parameters were recorded in
weeks 6, 7, and 8, whereas behaviour data were collected in week 8 only.
Results showed that welfare parameters of broiler chickens were affected by
genotype and floor type. Slow-growing broilers had better welfare parameters
than fast-growing broilers. The slatted floor had a positive effect on main
welfare parameters of the birds. Slower-growing broilers had a longer
distance in the avoidance distance test. Tonic immobility reaction was
longer in slow-growing broilers compared to fast-growing broiler. On the
other hand, floor type did not affect behaviour parameters. As a conclusion,
slow-growing broilers had better welfare parameters than fast-growing
broilers and slat flooring could be beneficial to improve broiler welfare,
but further behavioural investigations are needed such as dust bathing and
walking behaviour.
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Reference66 articles.
1. Akpobome, G. O. and Fanguy, R. C.: Evaluation of cage floor systems for
production of commercial broilers, Poultry Sci., 71, 274–280,
https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0710274, 1992. 2. Awad, W. A., Ghareeb, K., Abdel-Raheem, S., and Böhm, J.: Effects of
dietary inclusion of probiotic and synbiotic on growth performance, organ
weights, and intestinal histomorphology of broiler chickens, Poultry Sci., 88, 49–56, https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2008-00244, 2009. 3. Baracho, M., Nääs, I., Bueno, L., Nascimento, G., and Moura, D.:
Broiler walking ability and toe asymmetry under harsh rearing conditions,
Rev. Bras. Ciência Avícola, 14, 217–222,
https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-635X2012000300009, 2012. 4. Bassler, A. W., Arnould, C., Butterworth, A., Colin, L., De Jong, I. C.,
Ferrante, V., Ferrari, P., Haslam, S., Wemelsfelder, F., and Blokhuis, H. J.:
Potential risk factors associated with contact dermatitis, lameness,
negative emotional state, and fear of humans in broiler chicken flocks,
Poultry Sci., 92, 2811–2826, https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2013-03208, 2013. 5. Berg, C.: Health and welfare in organic poultry production, Acta Vet. Scand., 43, 95–2001, 2002.
Cited by
30 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|