Insights into ground strike point properties in Europe through the EUCLID lightning location system
-
Published:2024-07-23
Issue:7
Volume:24
Page:2511-2522
-
ISSN:1684-9981
-
Container-title:Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci.
Author:
Poelman Dieter RoelORCID, Kohlmann Hannes, Schulz WolfgangORCID
Abstract
Abstract. Evaluating the risk of lightning strikes to a particular structure typically involves adhering to the guidance outlined in IEC 62305-2. Among the multitude of factors influencing the overall risk, flash density emerges as a crucial parameter. According to its definition, each flash is assigned only one contact point to ground. Nevertheless, it is well known that, on average, flashes exhibit multiple ground termination points as shown by high-speed camera observations. In this research, lightning data collected by the European Cooperation for Lightning Detection (EUCLID) network are utilized in combination with a ground strike point (GSP) algorithm that aggregates individual strokes within a flash into ground strike points. This approach enables the examination of spatio-temporal patterns of GSPs across Europe throughout a decade, spanning from 2013 to 2022. Average GSP densities exhibit variations across the European continent, mirroring the observed patterns in flash densities. The highest densities are concentrated along the Adriatic Sea and the western Balkan region, reaching peak values of up to 8.5 GSPs km−2 yr−1. The spatial distribution of the mean number of ground strike points per flash reveals a noticeable increase in the Mediterranean, Adriatic, and Baltic Sea regions compared to inland areas. Moreover, it has been determined that the average number of GSPs per flash reaches its peak between September and November. Additionally, a daily pattern is discernible, with the lowest number of GSPs per flash occurring between 12:00 and 18:00 UTC (universal time coordinated). It is found that 95 % of the separation distances between distinct GSPs are less than 6.7 km. Lastly, it is worth noting that the presence of the Alps has an impact on GSP behaviour, resulting in lower GSP counts in comparison to the surrounding areas, along with the shortest average distances between different GSPs.
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Reference25 articles.
1. Bouquegneau, C., Kern, A., and Rousseau, A.: Flash density applied to lightning protection standards, in: Proc. GROUND 2012, Bonito, Brazil, Brazilian Society for Electrical Protection, http://seftim.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/11/Ground_2012_FLASH-DENSITY-APPLIED-TO-LIGHTNING-PROTECTION (last access: 22 July 2024), 2012. 2. Brook, M.: Breakdown of electric fields in winter storms, Res. Lett. Atmos. Elect., 12, 47–52, 1992. 3. Chisholm, W. A.: Can grounding affect lightning? Observations of lightning parameters in areas with contrasting resistivity, in: 2017 International Symposium on Lightning Protection (XIV SIPDA), 2–6 October 2017, Natal, Brazil, 389–401, https://doi.org/10.1109/SIPDA.2017.8116957, 2017. 4. Chronis, T., Cummins, K., Said, R., Koshak, W., McCaul, E., Williams, E. R., Stano, G. T., and Grant, M.: Climatological diurnal variation of negative CG lightning peak current over the continental United States, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 120, 582–589, https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JD022547, 2015. 5. Cooray, V., Jayaratne, R., and Cummins, K. L.: On the peak amplitude of lightning return stroke currents striking the sea, Atmos. Res., 149, 372–376, 2014.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|