High- and low-temperature pyrolysis profiles describe volatile organic compound emissions from western US wildfire fuels
-
Published:2018-07-03
Issue:13
Volume:18
Page:9263-9281
-
ISSN:1680-7324
-
Container-title:Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Atmos. Chem. Phys.
Author:
Sekimoto Kanako, Koss Abigail R., Gilman Jessica B., Selimovic Vanessa, Coggon Matthew M., Zarzana Kyle J.ORCID, Yuan BinORCID, Lerner Brian M.ORCID, Brown Steven S., Warneke Carsten, Yokelson Robert J.ORCID, Roberts James M.ORCID, de Gouw JoostORCID
Abstract
Abstract. Biomass burning is a large source of volatile organic compounds
(VOCs) and many other trace species to the atmosphere, which can act as
precursors to secondary pollutants such as ozone and fine particles.
Measurements performed with a proton-transfer-reaction time-of-flight mass
spectrometer during the FIREX 2016 laboratory intensive were analyzed with
positive matrix factorization (PMF), in order to understand the
instantaneous variability in VOC emissions from biomass burning, and to
simplify the description of these types of emissions. Despite the complexity
and variability of emissions, we found that a solution including just two
emission profiles, which are mass spectral representations of the relative
abundances of emitted VOCs, explained on average 85 % of the VOC emissions
across various fuels representative of the western US (including various
coniferous and chaparral fuels). In addition, the profiles were remarkably
similar across almost all of the fuel types tested. For example, the
correlation coefficient r2 of each profile between ponderosa pine
(coniferous tree) and manzanita (chaparral) is higher than 0.84. The
compositional differences between the two VOC profiles appear to be related
to differences in pyrolysis processes of fuel biopolymers at high and low
temperatures. These pyrolysis processes are thought to be the main source of
VOC emissions. “High-temperature” and “low-temperature” pyrolysis
processes do not correspond exactly to the commonly used “flaming” and
“smoldering” categories as described by modified combustion efficiency
(MCE). The average atmospheric properties (e.g., OH reactivity, volatility,
etc) of the high- and low-temperature profiles are significantly different.
We also found that the two VOC profiles can describe previously reported VOC
data for laboratory and field burns.
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Subject
Atmospheric Science
Reference52 articles.
1. Akagi, S. K., Yokelson, R. J., Wiedinmyer, C., Alvarado, M. J., Reid, J. S., Karl, T., Crounse, J. D., and Wennberg, P. O.: Emission
factors for open and domestic biomass burning for use in atmospheric models, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 4039–4072, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-4039-2011, 2011. 2. Alvarado, M. J., Wang, C, and Prinn, R. G.: Formation of ozone and growth of
aerosols in young smoke plumes from biomass burning: 2. Three-dimensional
Eulerian studies, J. Geophys. Res., 114, D09307,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JD011186, 2009. 3. Alvarado, M. J., Lonsdale, C. R., Yokelson, R. J., Akagi, S. K., Coe, H., Craven, J. S., Fischer, E. V., McMeeking, G. R.,
Seinfeld, J. H., Soni, T., Taylor, J. W., Weise, D. R., and Wold, C. E.: Investigating the links between ozone and organic
aerosol chemistry in a biomass burning plume from a prescribed fire in California chaparral, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 6667–6688,
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-6667-2015, 2015. 4. Atkinson, R. and Arey, J.: Atmospheric degradation of volatile organic
compounds, Chem. Rev., 103, 4605–4638,
https://doi.org/10.1021/cr0206420, 2003. 5. Babu, B. V.: Biomass pyrolysis: a state-of-the-art review, Biofuel. Bioprod.
Bior., 2, 393–414, https://doi.org/10.1002/bbb.92, 2008.
Cited by
109 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|