Consistent biases in Antarctic sea ice concentration simulated by climate models
-
Published:2018-01-29
Issue:1
Volume:12
Page:365-383
-
ISSN:1994-0424
-
Container-title:The Cryosphere
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:The Cryosphere
Author:
Roach Lettie A.ORCID, Dean Samuel M., Renwick James A.ORCID
Abstract
Abstract. The simulation of Antarctic sea ice in global climate models often
does not agree with observations. In this study, we examine the
compactness of sea ice, as well as the regional distribution of sea
ice concentration, in climate models from the latest Coupled Model
Intercomparison Project (CMIP5) and in satellite observations. We
find substantial differences in concentration values between
different sets of satellite observations, particularly at high
concentrations, requiring careful treatment when comparing to
models. As a fraction of total sea ice extent, models simulate too
much loose, low-concentration sea ice cover throughout the year, and
too little compact, high-concentration cover in the summer. In spite
of the differences in physics between models, these tendencies are
broadly consistent across the population of 40 CMIP5 simulations,
a result not previously highlighted. Separating models with and
without an explicit lateral melt term, we find that inclusion of
lateral melt may account for overestimation of low-concentration
cover. Targeted model experiments with a coupled ocean–sea ice
model show that choice of constant floe diameter in the lateral melt
scheme can also impact representation of loose ice. This suggests
that current sea ice thermodynamics contribute to the inadequate
simulation of the low-concentration regime in many models.
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Subject
Earth-Surface Processes,Water Science and Technology
Reference66 articles.
1. Andersen, S., Tonboe, R., Kern, S., and Schyberg, H.: Improved retrieval of
sea ice total concentration from spaceborne passive microwave observations
using numerical weather prediction model fields: an intercomparison of nine
algorithms, Remote Sens. Environ., 104, 374–392,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2006.05.013, 2006. a, b, c, d 2. Asplin, M. G., Scharien, R., Else, B., Howell, S., Barber, D. G.,
Papakyriakou, T., and Prinsenberg, S.: Implications of fractured Arctic
perennial ice cover on thermodynamic and dynamic sea ice processes, J.
Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 119, 2327–2343, 2014. a 3. Bennetts, L. G., O'Farrell, S., and Uotila, P.: Brief communication: Impacts
of ocean-wave-induced breakup of Antarctic sea ice via thermodynamics in a
stand-alone version of the CICE sea-ice model, The Cryosphere, 11,
1035–1040, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-11-1035-2017, 2017. a 4. Bentsen, M., Bethke, I., Debernard, J. B., Iversen, T., Kirkevåg, A.,
Seland, Ø., Drange, H., Roelandt, C., Seierstad, I. A., Hoose, C., and
Kristjánsson, J. E.: The Norwegian Earth System Model, NorESM1-M – Part
1: Description and basic evaluation of the physical climate, Geosci. Model
Dev., 6, 687–720, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-6-687-2013, 2013. a 5. Briegleb, B., Bitz, C. M., Hunke, E. C., Lipscomb, W. H., Holland, M. M.,
Schramm, J., and Moritz, R.: Scientific Description of the Sea Ice Component
in the Community Climate System Model, Version Three. NCAR/TN-463+STR, NCAR
Tech. Note, NCAR, Boulder, Colorado, USA, 1–78, 2004. a
Cited by
31 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|