Reassessing seasonal sea ice predictability of the Pacific-Arctic sector using a Markov model
-
Published:2022-04-01
Issue:3
Volume:16
Page:1141-1156
-
ISSN:1994-0424
-
Container-title:The Cryosphere
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:The Cryosphere
Author:
Wang Yunhe, Yuan XiaojunORCID, Bi Haibo, Bushuk Mitchell, Liang Yu, Li Cuihua, Huang Haijun
Abstract
Abstract. In this study, a regional linear Markov model is developed to assess
seasonal sea ice predictability in the Pacific-Arctic sector. Unlike an
earlier pan-Arctic Markov model that was developed with one set of variables
for all seasons, the regional model consists of four seasonal modules with
different sets of predictor variables, accommodating seasonally varying
driving processes. A series of sensitivity tests are performed to evaluate
the predictive skill in cross-validated experiments and to determine the
best model configuration for each season. The prediction skill, as measured
by the sea ice concentration (SIC) anomaly correlation coefficient (ACC)
between predictions and observations, increased by 32 % in the Bering Sea
and 18 % in the Sea of Okhotsk relative to the pan-Arctic model. The
regional Markov model's skill is also superior to the skill of an anomaly
persistence forecast. SIC trends significantly contribute to the model
skill. However, the model retains skill for detrended sea ice extent
predictions for up to 7-month lead times in the Bering Sea and the Sea of
Okhotsk. We find that subsurface ocean heat content (OHC) provides a crucial
source of prediction skill in all seasons, especially in the cold season,
and adding sea ice thickness (SIT) to the regional Markov model has a
substantial contribution to the prediction skill in the warm season but a
negative contribution in the cold season. The regional model can also
capture the seasonal reemergence of predictability, which is missing in the
pan-Arctic model.
Funder
National Natural Science Foundation of China Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province China Postdoctoral Science Foundation Key Laboratory of Marine Geology and Environment
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Subject
Earth-Surface Processes,Water Science and Technology
Reference71 articles.
1. Andersson, T. R., Hosking, J. S., Perez-Ortiz, M., Paige, B., Elliott, A.,
Russell, C., Law, S., Jones, D. C., Wilkinson, J., Phillips, T., Byrne, J.,
Tietsche, S., Sarojini, B. B., Blanchard-Wrigglesworth, E., Aksenov, Y.,
Downie, R., and Shuckburgh, E.: Seasonal Arctic sea ice forecasting with
probabilistic deep learning, Nat. Commun., 12, 5124,
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-25257-4, 2021. 2. Barnston, A. G. and Ropelewski, C. F.: Prediction of ENSO Episodes Using
Canonical Correlation Analysis, J. Climate, 5, 1316–1345,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0442(1992)005<1316:poeeuc>2.0.co;2, 1992. 3. Blanchard-Wrigglesworth, E., Armour, K. C., Bitz, C. M., and DeWeaver, E.:
Persistence and Inherent Predictability of Arctic Sea Ice in a GCM Ensemble
and Observations, J. Climate, 24, 231–250,
https://doi.org/10.1175/2010jcli3775.1, 2011. 4. Blanchard-Wrigglesworth, E., Cullather, R., Wang, W., Zhang, J., and Bitz,
C.: Model forecast skill and sensitivity to initial conditions in the
seasonal Sea Ice Outlook, Geophys. Res. Lett., 42, 8042–8048,
https://doi.org/10.1002/2015GL065860, 2015. 5. Blockley, E. W. and Peterson, K. A.: Improving Met Office seasonal predictions of Arctic sea ice using assimilation of CryoSat-2 thickness, The Cryosphere, 12, 3419–3438, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-12-3419-2018, 2018.
Cited by
7 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|