Design optimization of offshore wind jacket piles by assessing support structure orientation relative to metocean conditions
-
Published:2023-05-25
Issue:5
Volume:8
Page:807-817
-
ISSN:2366-7451
-
Container-title:Wind Energy Science
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Wind Energ. Sci.
Author:
Mroczek Maciej M.,Arwade Sanjay Raja,Lackner Matthew A.
Abstract
Abstract. The orientation of a three-legged offshore wind jacket structure in 60 m water depth, supporting the IEA 15 MW reference turbine, has been assessed for optimizing the jacket pile design. A reference site off the coast of Massachusetts was considered, including site-specific metocean conditions and realistically plausible geotechnical conditions. Soil–structure interaction was modeled using three-dimensional finite-element (FE) ground–structure simulations to obtain equivalent mudline springs, which were subsequently used in nonlinear elastic simulations, considering aerodynamic and hydrodynamic loading of extreme sea states in the time domain. Jacket pile loads were found to be sensitive to the maximum 50-year wave direction, as opposed to the wind direction, indicating that the jacket orientation should be considered relative to the dominant wave direction. The results further demonstrated that the jacket orientation has a substantial impact on the overall jacket pile mass and maximum pile embedment depth and therefore represents an important opportunity for project cost and risk reductions. Finally, this research highlights the importance of detailed knowledge of the full global model behavior (both turbine and foundation) for capturing this optimization potential, particularly due to the influence of wind–wave misalignment on pile loads. Close collaboration between the turbine supplier and foundation designer, at the appropriate design stages, is essential.
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Subject
Energy Engineering and Power Technology,Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
Reference22 articles.
1. Beiter, P., Rand, J. T., Seel, J., Lantz, E., Gilman, P., and Wiser, R.: Expert perspectives on the wind plant of the future, Wind Energy, https://doi.org/10.1002/we.2735, in press, 2022. a 2. Chew, K. H., Ng, E., Tai, K., Muskulus, M., and Zwick, D.: Structural
optimization and parametric study of offshore wind turbine jacket
substructure, in: The Twenty-third International Offshore and Polar Engineering Conference, June 2013, Anchorage, Alaska, ISOPE-I-13-010, 2013. a, b 3. Chew, K. H., Ng, E., Tai, K., Muskulus, M., and Zwick, D.: Offshore wind
turbine jacket substructure: A comparison study between four-legged and
three-legged designs, J. Ocean Wind Energ., 1, 74–81, 2014. a, b, c 4. Gaertner, E., Rinker, J., Sethuraman, L., Zahle, F., Anderson, B., Barter, G. E., Abbas, N. J., Meng, F., Bortolotti, P., Skrzypinski, W., and Scott, G. N.: IEA wind TCP task 37: definition of the IEA 15-megawatt offshore reference wind turbine, Tech. rep. no. NREL/TP-5000-75698, NREL – National Renewable Energy Lab., Golden, CO, USA, 2020. a, b, c 5. Gringorten, I. I.: A plotting rule for extreme probability paper, J. Geophys. Res., 68, 813–814, 1963. a
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|