HO<sub><i>x</i></sub> radical chemistry in oxidation flow reactors with low-pressure mercury lamps systematically examined by modeling
Author:
Peng Z.ORCID, Day D. A.ORCID, Stark H.ORCID, Li R., Palm B. B., Brune W. H.ORCID, Jimenez J. L.ORCID
Abstract
Abstract. Oxidation flow reactors (OFRs) using OH produced from low-pressure Hg lamps at 254 nm (OFR254) or both 185 and 254 nm (OFR185) are commonly used in atmospheric chemistry and other fields. OFR254 requires the addition of externally formed O3 since OH is formed from O3 photolysis, while OFR185 does not since O2 can be photolyzed to produce O3 and OH can also be formed from H2O photolysis. In this study, we use a plug-flow kinetic model to investigate OFR properties under a very wide range of conditions applicable to both field and laboratory studies. We show that the radical chemistry in OFRs can be characterized as a function of UV light intensity, H2O concentration, and total external OH reactivity (OHRext, e.g., from VOCs, NOx, and SO2). OH exposure is decreased by added external OH reactivity. OFR185 is especially sensitive to this effect at low UV intensity due to low primary OH production. OFR254 can be more resilient against OH suppression at high injected O3 (e.g., 70 ppm), as a larger primary OH source from O3, as well as enhanced recycling of HO2 to OH, make external perturbations to the radical chemistry less significant. However if the external OH reactivity in OFR254 is much larger than OH reactivity from injected O3, OH suppression can reach two orders of magnitude. For a typical input of 7 ppm O3 (OHRO3 = 10 s−1) ten-fold OH suppression is observed at OHRext ∼ 100 s−1, which is similar or lower than used in many laboratory studies. This finding may have important implications for the interpretation of past laboratory studies, as applying OHexp measurements acquired under different conditions could lead to over an order-of-magnitude error in the estimated OHexp. The uncertainties of key model outputs due to uncertainty in all rate constants and absorption cross-sections in the model are within ± 25% for OH exposure and within ± 60% for other parameters. These uncertainties are small relative to the dynamic range of outputs. Uncertainty analysis shows that most of the uncertainty is contributed by photolysis rates of O3, O2, and H2O and reactions of OH and HO2 with themselves or with some abundant species, i.e., O3 and H2O2. Using HOx-recycling vs. destructive external OH reactivity only leads to small changes in OHexp under most conditions. Changing the identity (rate constant) of external OH reactants can result in substantial changes in OHexp due to different reductions in OH suppression as the reactant is consumed. We also report two equations for estimating OH exposure in OFR254. We find that the equation estimating OHexp from measured O3 consumption performs better than an alternative equation that does not use it, and thus recommend measuring both input and output O3 concentrations in OFR254 experiments. This study contributes to establishing a firm and systematic understanding of the gas-phase HOx and Ox chemistry in these reactors, and enables better experiment planning and interpretation as well as improved design of future reactors.
Funder
California Air Resources Board Biological and Environmental Research Division of Atmospheric and Geospace Sciences U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Reference53 articles.
1. Andreozzi, R., Caprio, V., Insola, A., and Marotta, R.: Advanced oxidation processes (AOP) for water purification and recovery, Catal. Today, 53, 51–59, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0920-5861(99)00102-9, 1999. 2. Bahreini, R., Middlebrook, A. M., Brock, C. A., de Gouw, J. A., McKeen, S. A., Williams, L. R., Daumit, K. E., Lambe, A. T., Massoli, P., Canagaratna, M. R., Ahmadov, R., Carrasquillo, A. J., Cross, E. S., Ervens, B., Holloway, J. S., Hunter, J. F., Onasch, T. B., Pollack, I. B., Roberts, J. M., Ryerson, T. B., Warneke, C., Davidovits, P., Worsnop, D. R., and Kroll, J. H.: Mass spectral analysis of organic aerosol formed downwind of the Deepwater Horizon oil spill: field studies and laboratory confirmations, Environ. Sci. Technol., 46, 8025–8034, https://doi.org/10.1021/es301691k, 2012. 3. BIPM, IEC, IFCC, ILAC, ISO, IUPAC and IUPAPOIML: JCGM 101: 2008 Evaluation of measurement data – Supplement 1 to the "Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement" – Propagation of distributions using a Monte Carlo method, available at: http://www.bipm.org/utils/common/documents/jcgm/JCGM_101_2008_E.pdf (last access: March 2015), 2008. 4. Carlton, A. G., Wiedinmyer, C., and Kroll, J. H.: A review of Secondary Organic Aerosol (SOA) formation from isoprene, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 4987–5005, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-4987-2009, 2009. 5. Carter, W. P. L., Cocker, D. R., Fitz, D. R., Malkina, I. L., Bumiller, K., Sauer, C. G., Pisano, J. T., Bufalino, C. and Song, C.: A new environmental chamber for evaluation of gas-phase chemical mechanisms and secondary aerosol formation, Atmos. Environ., 39(40), 7768–7788, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2005.08.040, 2005.
Cited by
5 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|