Abstract
Abstract. It is now widely accepted that astronomical factors
trigger the emergence of glacial and interglacial periods. However, nearly
two centuries ago, the overall situation was not as apparent as it is today.
In this article, I briefly discuss the astronomical model of ice ages put
forward in the 19th and early 20th centuries. This period was indeed anni mirabiles for
scientists to understand the ice age phenomenon. Agassiz, Adhémar and
Croll laid the foundation stones for understanding the dynamics of ice ages.
But it was Milankovitch who combined empirical geology with mathematical
astronomy. Specifically, he identified the shortcomings of the preceding ice
age models and modified his model accordingly. In what follows, I review
earlier approaches to the ice age problem and show how they failed to meet
their objectives. Next, I show how Milankovitch's model managed to capture
all sufficient astronomical elements. The final sections focus on Milutin
Milankovitch's successful approach, including his accomplishment of tackling
the problem mathematically.
Subject
History and Philosophy of Science,General Earth and Planetary Sciences
Reference42 articles.
1. Adhémar, J. A.: Révolutions de la mer, Carilian–Goeury et V.
Dalmont, Paris, 1842.
2. Agassiz, L.: On the Erratic Blocks of the Jura, The Edinburgh New
Philosophical Journal, XXIV (October 1837–April 1838), 176–179, 1838.
3. Agassiz, L.: Early Discoverers III A Letter from Agassiz on Glaciation,
J. Glaciol., 1, 294, https://doi.org/10.3189/002214349793702610, 1871/1949.
4. Agassiz, E. C.: Louis Agassiz. His Life and Correspondence, Vol. I &II, Mifflin & Company,
Houghton, Boston, 1886.
5. Andersen, B. G.: Jens Esmark – a pioneer in glacial geology, Boreas,
21, 97–102, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1502-3885.1992.tb00016.x, 1992.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献