Factors selection in landslide susceptibility modelling on large scale following the gis matrix method: application to the river Beiro basin (Spain)
-
Published:2012-02-13
Issue:2
Volume:12
Page:327-340
-
ISSN:1684-9981
-
Container-title:Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci.
Author:
Costanzo D.,Rotigliano E.,Irigaray C.,Jiménez-Perálvarez J. D.,Chacón J.
Abstract
Abstract. A procedure to select the controlling factors connected to the slope instability has been defined. It allowed us to assess the landslide susceptibility in the Rio Beiro basin (about 10 km2) over the northeastern area of the city of Granada (Spain). Field and remote (Google EarthTM) recognition techniques allowed us to generate a landslide inventory consisting in 127 phenomena. To discriminate between stable and unstable conditions, a diagnostic area had been chosen as the one limited to the crown and the toe of the scarp of the landslide. 15 controlling or determining factors have been defined considering topographic, geologic, geomorphologic and pedologic available data. Univariate tests, using both association coefficients and validation results of single-variable susceptibility models, allowed us to select the best predictors, which were combined for the unique conditions analysis. For each of the five recognised landslide typologies, susceptibility maps for the best models were prepared. In order to verify both the goodness of fit and the prediction skill of the susceptibility models, two different validation procedures were applied and compared. Both procedures are based on a random partition of the landslide archive for producing a test and a training subset. The first method is based on the analysis of the shape of the success and prediction rate curves, which are quantitatively analysed exploiting two morphometric indexes. The second method is based on the analysis of the degree of fit, by considering the relative error between the intersected target landslides by each of the different susceptibility classes in which the study area was partitioned. Both the validation procedures confirmed a very good predictive performance of the susceptibility models and of the actual procedure followed to select the controlling factors.
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Subject
General Earth and Planetary Sciences
Reference50 articles.
1. Burrough, P. A.: Principles of geographical information systems for land resource assessment, Clarendon Press, Oxford, UK, 194 pp., 1986. 2. Carrara, A., Cardinali, M., Detti, R., Guzzetti, F., Pasqui, V., and Reichenbach, P.: GIS techniques and statistical models in evaluating landslide hazard, Earth Surf. Proc. Land., 16, 427–445, 1991. 3. Carrara, A., Cardinali, M., and Guzzetti, F.: GIS technology in mapping landslide hazard, in: Geographical Information Systems in Assessing Nat. Hazards., edited by: Carrara, A. and Guzzetti, F., Kluwer Academic Publisher, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 135–175, 1995. 4. Carrara, A., Crosta, G., and Frattini, P.: Comparing models of debris-flow susceptibility in the alpine environment, Geomorphology, 94, 353–378, 2008. 5. Chacón, J.: Los conceptos actuales de susceptibilidad, peligrosidad y riesgo, en la prevención de movimientos de ladera, con ejemplos de aplicaciones prácticas, in: 44° Congresso Brasileiro de Geología, edited by: Lima, R. E. and Leite, J. C., Publicaçao Especial, 30 Octubre 2008, "Desastres e riscos geológicos em Curitiba e litoral, Roteiro de Excursao Técnica, CENACID, Curitiba, UFP, 43 pp., 2008a.
Cited by
157 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|