Circular depolarization ratios of single water droplets and finite ice circular cylinders: a modeling study
-
Published:2012-05-11
Issue:9
Volume:12
Page:4207-4214
-
ISSN:1680-7324
-
Container-title:Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Atmos. Chem. Phys.
Author:
Nicolet M.,Schnaiter M.,Stetzer O.
Abstract
Abstract. Computations of the phase matrix elements for single water droplets and ice crystals in fixed orientations are presented to determine if circular depolarization δC is more accurate than linear depolarization for phase discrimination. T-matrix simulations were performed to calculate right-handed and left-handed circular depolarization ratios δ+C, respectively δ−C and to compare them with linear ones. Ice crystals are assumed to have a circular cylindrical shape where their surface-equivalent diameters range up to 5 μm. The circular depolarization ratios of ice particles were generally higher than linear depolarization and depended mostly on the particle orientation as well as their sizes. The fraction of non-detectable ice crystals (δ<0.05) was smaller considering a circular polarized light source, reaching 4.5%. However, water droplets also depolarized light circularly for scattering angles smaller than 179° and size parameters smaller than 6 at side- and backscattering regions. Differentiation between ice crystals and water droplets might be difficult for experiments performed at backscattering angles which deviate from 180° unlike LIDAR applications. Instruments exploiting the difference in the P44/P11 ratio at a scattering angle around 115° are significantly constrained in distinguishing between water and ice because small droplets with size parameters between 5 and 10 do cause very high circular depolarizations at this angle. If the absence of the liquid phase is confirmed, the use of circular depolarization in single particle detection is more sensitive and less affected by particle orientation.
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Subject
Atmospheric Science
Reference35 articles.
1. Baran, A. J., Yang, P., and Havemann, S.: Calculation of the single-scattering properties of randomly oriented hexagonal ice columns: a comparison of the T-matrix and the finite-difference time-domain methods, Appl. Optics, 40, 4376–4386, 2001. 2. Bundke, U., Nilius, B., Jaenicke, R., Wetter, T., Klein, H., and Bingemer, H.: The Fast Ice Nucleus chamber FINCH, Atmos. Res., 90, 180–186, 2008. 3. Cantrell, W. and Heymsfield, A.: Production of ice in tropospheric clouds – a review, Bull. Amer. Meteorol. Soc., 86, 795, https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-86-6-795, 2005. 4. Forster, P., Ramaswamy, V., Artaxo, P., Bernsten, T., Betts, R., Fahey, D. W., Haywood, J., Lean, J., Lowe, D. C., Myhre, G., Nganga, J., Prinn, R., Raga, G., Schulz, M., and Dorland, R. V.: Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK and New York, USA, 2007. 5. Fukuta, N. and Kramer, G. K.: A fast activation continuous ice nuclei counter, J. Rech. Atmos., 3, 169–173, 1968.
Cited by
16 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|