Author:
Altarejos-García L.,Martínez-Chenoll M. L.,Escuder-Bueno I.,Serrano-Lombillo A.
Abstract
Abstract. This paper addresses the use of reliability techniques such as Rosenblueth's Point-Estimate Method (PEM) as a practical alternative to more precise Monte Carlo approaches to get estimates of the mean and variance of uncertain flood parameters water depth and velocity. These parameters define the flood severity, which is a concept used for decision-making in the context of flood risk assessment. The method proposed is particularly useful when the degree of complexity of the hydraulic models makes Monte Carlo inapplicable in terms of computing time, but when a measure of the variability of these parameters is still needed. The capacity of PEM, which is a special case of numerical quadrature based on orthogonal polynomials, to evaluate the first two moments of performance functions such as the water depth and velocity is demonstrated in the case of a single river reach using a 1-D HEC-RAS model. It is shown that in some cases, using a simple variable transformation, statistical distributions of both water depth and velocity approximate the lognormal. As this distribution is fully defined by its mean and variance, PEM can be used to define the full probability distribution function of these flood parameters and so allowing for probability estimations of flood severity. Then, an application of the method to the same river reach using a 2-D Shallow Water Equations (SWE) model is performed. Flood maps of mean and standard deviation of water depth and velocity are obtained, and uncertainty in the extension of flooded areas with different severity levels is assessed. It is recognized, though, that whenever application of Monte Carlo method is practically feasible, it is a preferred approach.
Subject
General Earth and Planetary Sciences,General Engineering,General Environmental Science
Reference63 articles.
1. Aronica, G., Hankin, B., and Beven, K. J.: Uncertainty and equifinality in calibrating distributed roughness coefficients in a flood propagation model with limited data, Adv. Water Resour., 22, 349–365, 1998.
2. Berz, G.: Flood disaster: Lessons from the past-worries for the future, Water Manage. Mar. Eng., 142, 1–10, 2000.
3. Beven, K. J. and Binley, A.: The future of distributed models: model calibration and uncertainty prediction, Hydrol. Process., 6, 279–298, 1992.
4. Bladé, E., Gómez, M., and Dolz, J.: Quasi-two dimensional modelling of flood routing in rivers and flood plains by means of storage cells, in: Modelling of Flood Propagation Over Initially Dry Areas, edited by: Molinaro, P. and Natal, L., American Society of Engineers, Milan, 1994.
5. Box, G. E. P. and Draper, N. R.: Empirical model building and response surfaces, Wiley, 1987.
Cited by
18 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献