Particle size distributions from laboratory-scale biomass fires using fast response instruments
-
Published:2010-08-30
Issue:16
Volume:10
Page:8065-8076
-
ISSN:1680-7324
-
Container-title:Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Atmos. Chem. Phys.
Author:
Hosseini S.,Li Q.,Cocker D.,Weise D.,Miller A.,Shrivastava M.,Miller J. W.,Mahalingam S.,Princevac M.,Jung H.
Abstract
Abstract. Particle size distribution from biomass combustion is an important parameter as it affects air quality, climate modelling and health effects. To date, particle size distributions reported from prior studies vary not only due to difference in fuels but also difference in experimental conditions. This study aims to report characteristics of particle size distributions in well controlled repeatable lab scale biomass fires for southwestern United States fuels with focus on chaparral. The combustion laboratory at the United States Department of Agriculture-Forest Service's Fire Science Laboratory (USDA-FSL), Missoula, MT provided a repeatable combustion and dilution environment ideal for measurements. For a variety of fuels tested the major mode of particle size distribution was in the range of 29 to 52 nm, which is attributable to dilution of the fresh smoke. Comparing mass size distribution from FMPS and APS measurement 51–68% of particle mass was attributable to the particles ranging from 0.5 to 10 μm for PM10. Geometric mean diameter rapidly increased during flaming and gradually decreased during mixed and smoldering phase combustion. Most fuels produced a unimodal distribution during flaming phase and strong biomodal distribution during smoldering phase. The mode of combustion (flaming, mixed and smoldering) could be better distinguished using the slopes in MCE (Modified Combustion Efficiency) vs. geometric mean diameter than only using MCE values.
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Subject
Atmospheric Science
Reference33 articles.
1. Byun, D. W. and Schere, K. L.: Review of Governing equations, Computational Algorithms, and Other Components of the Models-3 Community Multi-scale Air Quality (CMAQ) Modeling Systems, Appl. Mech. Rev., 59, 51–77, 2006. 2. Capes, G., Johnson, B., McFiggans, G., Williams, P. I., Haywood, J., and Coe, H.: Aging of biomass burning aerosols over West Africa: Aircraft measurements of chemical composition, microphysical properties, and emission ratios, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 113, D00C15, https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JD009845, 2008. 3. Chakrabarty, R. K., Moosmuller, H., Garro, M. A., Arnott, W. P., Walker, J., Susott, R. A., Babbitt, R. E., Wold, C. E., Lincoln, E. N., and Hao, W. M.: Emissions from the laboratory combustion of wildland fuels: Particle morphology and size, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 111, D07204, https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JD00665, 2006. 4. Chen, B. T., Cheng, Y. S., and Yeh, H. C.: Performance of a TSI Aerodynamic Particle Sizer, Aerosol Sci. Technol., 4, 89–97, 1985. 5. Chi, C. T., Horn, D. A., Reznik, R. B., Zanders, D. L., Opferkuch, R. E., Nyers, J. M., Pierovich, J. M., Lavdas, L. G., Mcmahon, C. K., Nelson, R. M., Johansen, R. W., and Ryan, P. W.: Source assessment: prescribed burning, state of the art, US Environmental Protection Agency, EPA (US) Report EPA-600/2-79-019h, November 1979.
Cited by
85 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|