Development of a general calibration model and long-term performance evaluation of low-cost sensors for air pollutant gas monitoring
-
Published:2019-02-11
Issue:2
Volume:12
Page:903-920
-
ISSN:1867-8548
-
Container-title:Atmospheric Measurement Techniques
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Atmos. Meas. Tech.
Author:
Malings CarlORCID, Tanzer Rebecca, Hauryliuk Aliaksei, Kumar Sriniwasa P. N., Zimmerman NaomiORCID, Kara Levent B., Presto Albert A.,
Abstract
Abstract. Assessing the intracity spatial distribution and temporal variability in air
quality can be facilitated by a dense network of monitoring stations.
However, the cost of implementing such a network can be prohibitive if
traditional high-quality, expensive monitoring systems are used. To this end,
the Real-time Affordable Multi-Pollutant (RAMP) monitor has been developed,
which can measure up to five gases including the criteria pollutant gases
carbon monoxide (CO), nitrogen dioxide (NO2), and ozone
(O3), along with temperature and relative humidity. This study
compares various algorithms to calibrate the RAMP measurements including
linear and quadratic regression, clustering, neural networks, Gaussian
processes, and hybrid random forest–linear regression
models. Using data collected by almost 70 RAMP monitors over periods ranging
up to 18 months, we recommend the use of limited quadratic regression
calibration models for CO, neural network models for NO, and hybrid models
for NO2 and O3 for any low-cost monitor using
electrochemical sensors similar to those of the RAMP. Furthermore,
generalized calibration models may be used instead of individual models with
only a small reduction in overall performance. Generalized models also
transfer better when the RAMP is deployed to other locations. For long-term
deployments, it is recommended that model performance be re-evaluated and new
models developed periodically, due to the noticeable change in performance
over periods of a year or more. This makes generalized calibration models
even more useful since only a subset of deployed monitors are needed to build
these new models. These results will help guide future efforts in the
calibration and use of low-cost sensor systems worldwide.
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Subject
Atmospheric Science
Reference29 articles.
1. Afshar-Mohajer, N., Zuidema, C., Sousan, S., Hallett, L., Tatum, M., Rule, A.
M., Thomas, G., Peters, T. M., and Koehler, K.: Evaluation of low-cost
electro-chemical sensors for environmental monitoring of ozone, nitrogen
dioxide, and carbon monoxide, J. Occup. Environ. Hyg., 15, 87–98,
https://doi.org/10.1080/15459624.2017.1388918, 2018. 2. Aleksander, I. and Morton, H.: An introduction to neural computing, 2nd Edn.,
International Thomson Computer Press, London, 1995. 3. Camalier, L., Eberly, S., Miller, J., and Papp, M.: Guideline on the Meaning
and the Use of Precision and Bias Data Required by 40 CFR Part 58 Appendix A,
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, available at:
https://www3.epa.gov/ttn/amtic/files/ambient/monitorstrat/precursor/07workshopmeaning.pdf
(last access: 5 February 2019), 2007. 4. Castell, N., Dauge, F. R., Schneider, P., Vogt, M., Lerner, U., Fishbain, B.,
Broday, D., and Bartonova, A.: Can commercial low-cost sensor platforms
contribute to air quality monitoring and exposure estimates?, Environ. Int.,
99, 293–302, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2016.12.007, 2017. 5. Cross, E. S., Williams, L. R., Lewis, D. K., Magoon, G. R., Onasch, T. B.,
Kaminsky, M. L., Worsnop, D. R., and Jayne, J. T.: Use of electrochemical
sensors for measurement of air pollution: correcting interference response
and validating measurements, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 10, 3575–3588,
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-10-3575-2017, 2017.
Cited by
119 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|