Miocene Antarctic Ice Sheet area adapts significantly faster than volume to CO2-induced climate change
-
Published:2024-01-30
Issue:1
Volume:20
Page:257-266
-
ISSN:1814-9332
-
Container-title:Climate of the Past
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Clim. Past
Author:
Stap Lennert B.ORCID, Berends Constantijn J.ORCID, van de Wal Roderik S. W.
Abstract
Abstract. The strongly varying benthic δ18O levels of the early and mid-Miocene (23 to 14 Myr ago) are primarily caused by a combination of changes in Antarctic Ice Sheet (AIS) volume and deep-ocean temperatures. These factors are coupled since AIS changes affect deep-ocean temperatures. It has recently been argued that this is due to changes in ice sheet area rather than volume because area changes affect the surface albedo. This finding would be important when the transient AIS grows relatively faster in extent than in thickness, which we test here. We analyse simulations of Miocene AIS variability carried out using the three-dimensional ice sheet model IMAU-ICE forced by warm (high CO2, no ice) and cold (low CO2, large East AIS) climate snapshots. These simulations comprise equilibrium and idealized quasi-orbital transient runs with strongly varying CO2 levels (280 to 840 ppm). Our simulations show a limited direct effect of East AIS changes on Miocene orbital-timescale benthic δ18O variability because of the slow build-up of volume. However, we find that relative to the equilibrium ice sheet size, the AIS area adapts significantly faster and more strongly than volume to the applied forcing variability. Consequently, during certain intervals the ice sheet is receding at the margins, while ice is still building up in the interior. That means the AIS does not adapt to a changing equilibrium size at the same rate or with the same sign everywhere. Our results indicate that the Miocene Antarctic Ice Sheet affects deep-ocean temperatures more than its volume suggests.
Funder
Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek Horizon 2020
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Reference47 articles.
1. Beckmann, A. and Goosse, H.: A parameterization of ice shelf–ocean interaction for climate models, Ocean Modell., 5, 157–170, https://doi.org/10.1016/S1463-5003(02)00019-7, 2003. a 2. Berends, C. J. and Stap, L. B.: IMAU-ICE v1.1.1-MIO archive, Zenodo [code], https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6352125, 2021. a, b 3. Berends, C. J., de Boer, B., and van de Wal, R. S. W.: Application of HadCM3@Bristolv1.0 simulations of paleoclimate as forcing for an ice-sheet model, ANICE2.1: set-up and benchmark experiments, Geosci. Model Dev., 11, 4657–4675, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-4657-2018, 2018. a, b, c, d 4. Berends, C. J., Goelzer, H., Reerink, T. J., Stap, L. B., and van de Wal, R. S. W.: Benchmarking the vertically integrated ice-sheet model IMAU-ICE (version 2.0), Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 5667–5688, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-5667-2022, 2022. a, b 5. Berends, C. J., Stap, L. B., and van de Wal, R. S. W.: Strong impact of sub-shelf melt parameterisation on ice-sheet retreat in idealised and realistic Antarctic topography, J. Glaciol., 69, 1–15, https://doi.org/10.1017/jog.2023.33, 2023. a, b
|
|