ISBA-MEB (SURFEX v8.1): model snow evaluation for local-scale forest sites
-
Published:2020-12-23
Issue:12
Volume:13
Page:6523-6545
-
ISSN:1991-9603
-
Container-title:Geoscientific Model Development
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Geosci. Model Dev.
Author:
Napoly Adrien,Boone Aaron,Welfringer Théo
Abstract
Abstract. Accurate modeling of the effect of snow cover on the surface energy and mass fluxes is required from land surface models. The Interactions between Soil–Biosphere–Atmosphere (ISBA) model uses a composite soil–vegetation approach that has limitations when representing snow and soil phase change processes in areas of high vegetation cover since it does not explicitly represent the snowpack lying on the ground below the canopy. In particular, previous studies using ISBA have pointed out that the snowpack ablation tends to occur to early in the season in forest regions in the Northern Hemisphere.
The multi-energy balance (MEB) version of ISBA has been developed recently, to a large degree, to address this issue. A vegetation layer, which is distinct from the soil, has been added to ISBA and new processes are now explicitly represented, such as snow interception and an understory litter layer.
To evaluate the behavior of this new scheme in a cold forested region, long-term offline simulations have been performed for the three BERMS forest sites located in Saskatchewan, Canada.
It is shown that the new scheme leads to an improved energy budget representation, especially in terms of the ground and sensible heat fluxes, with decreases in root-mean-square error (RMSE) of 77 % and 18 %, respectively. A positive impact for soil temperatures, consistent with the improvement of the ground heat flux, is obtained, particularly in terms of bias, which is reduced from −6.2 to −0.1 K at a 10 cm soil depth on average for the three sites and 12 studied years.
The impact of using MEB on the snowpack simulation is a better agreement with observations during the snow season, especially concerning the last day of snow in the season: errors are on the order of 1 d averaged over the three sites and all of the years using MEB, which represents a reduction in error of 20 d compared to the composite scheme.
The analysis shows that this improvement is mostly caused by the ability of MEB to represent a snowpack that nearly completely covers the soil below the canopy and that decouples the soil from the atmosphere, while keeping a close coupling between the vegetation and the atmosphere.
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Reference70 articles.
1. Bartlett, P., Mackay, M., and Verseghy, D.: Modified snow algorithms in the
Canadian Land Surface Scheme: Model runs and sensitivity analysis at three
boreal forest stands, Atmos.-Ocean, 44, 207–222, 2006. a, b, c, d 2. Bonan, G. B., Patton, E. G., Harman, I. N., Oleson, K. W., Finnigan, J. J., Lu, Y., and Burakowski, E. A.: Modeling canopy-induced turbulence in the Earth system: a unified parameterization of turbulent exchange within plant canopies and the roughness sublayer (CLM-ml v0), Geosci. Model Dev., 11, 1467–1496, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-1467-2018, 2018. a 3. Bony, S., Colman, R., Kattsov, V. M., Allan, R. P., Bretherton, C. S.,
Dufresne, J. L., Hall, A., Hallegatte, S., Holland, M. M., Ingram, W.,
Randall, D. A., Soden, B. J., Tselioudis, G., G., and Webb, M. J.: How well
do we understand and evaluate climate change feedback processes?, J. Climate,
19, 3445–3482, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI3819.1, 2006. a 4. Boone, A. and Etchevers, P.: An intercomparison of three snow schemes of
varying complexity coupled to the same land-surface model: Local scale
evaluation at an Alpine site, J. Hydrometeorol., 2, 374–394, 2001. a, b 5. Boone, A., Masson, V., Meyers, T., and Noilhan, J.: he influence of the
inclusion of soil freezing on simulations by a soil-vegetation-atmosphere
transfer scheme, J. Appl. Meteorol., 9, 1544–1569, 2000. a
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|