Synthetic seismicity distribution in Guerrero–Oaxaca subduction zone, Mexico, and its implications on the role of asperities in Gutenberg–Richter law
-
Published:2020-12-18
Issue:12
Volume:13
Page:6361-6381
-
ISSN:1991-9603
-
Container-title:Geoscientific Model Development
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Geosci. Model Dev.
Author:
Monterrubio-Velasco MarisolORCID, Zúñiga F. Ramón, Rodríguez-Pérez Quetzalcoatl, Rojas Otilio, Aguilar-Meléndez Armando, de la Puente JosepORCID
Abstract
Abstract. Seismicity and magnitude distributions are fundamental for seismic hazard analysis. The Mexican subduction margin along the Pacific Coast is one of the most active seismic zones in the world, which makes it an optimal region for observation and experimentation analyses. Some remarkable seismicity features have been observed on a subvolume of this subduction region, suggesting that the observed simplicity of earthquake sources arises from the rupturing of single asperities. This subregion has been named SUB3 in a recent seismotectonic regionalization of Mexico. In this work, we numerically test this hypothesis using the TREMOL (sThochastic Rupture Earthquake MOdeL) v0.1.0 code. As test cases, we choose four of the most significant recent events (6.5 < Mw < 7.8) that occurred in the Guerrero–Oaxaca region (SUB3) during the period 1988–2018, and whose associated seismic histories are well recorded in the regional catalogs. Synthetic seismicity results show a reasonable fit to the real data, which improves when the available data from the real events increase. These results give support to the hypothesis that single-asperity ruptures are a distinctive feature that controls seismicity in SUB3. Moreover, a fault aspect ratio sensitivity analysis is carried out to study how the synthetic seismicity varies. Our results indicate that asperity shape is an important modeling parameter controlling the frequency–magnitude distribution of synthetic data. Therefore, TREMOL provides appropriate means to model complex seismicity curves, such as those observed in the SUB3 region, and highlights its usefulness as a tool to shed additional light on the earthquake process.
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Reference53 articles.
1. Aki, K.: Asperities, barriers, characteristic earthquakes and strong motion
prediction, J. Geophys. Res.-Sol. Ea., 89, 5867–5872,
1984. a, b, c 2. Aki, K. and Richards, P. G.: Quantitative seismology, University Science Books, ISBN 0935702962, 2002. a 3. Allen, C. R.: The tectonic environments of seismically active and inactive
areas along the San Andreas fault system, Stanford University Publications,
Geological Sciences, 11, 70–80, 1968. a, b 4. Blaser, L., Krüger, F., Ohrnberger, M., and Scherbaum, F.: Scaling
relations of earthquake source parameter estimates with special focus on
subduction environment, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am.,
100, 2914–2926, 2010. a 5. Console, R., Carluccio, R., Papadimitriou, E., and Karakostas, V.: Synthetic
earthquake catalogs simulating seismic activity in the Corinth Gulf, Greece,
fault system, J. Geophys. Res.-Sol. Ea., 120, 326–343,
2015. a
|
|