Simulating second-generation herbaceous bioenergy crop yield using the global hydrological model H08 (v.bio1)
-
Published:2020-12-02
Issue:12
Volume:13
Page:6077-6092
-
ISSN:1991-9603
-
Container-title:Geoscientific Model Development
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Geosci. Model Dev.
Author:
Ai ZhipinORCID, Hanasaki NaotaORCID, Heck Vera, Hasegawa TomokoORCID, Fujimori Shinichiro
Abstract
Abstract. Large-scale deployment of bioenergy plantations would have adverse
effects on water resources. There is an increasing need to ensure the
appropriate inclusion of the bioenergy crops in global hydrological models.
Here, through parameter calibration and algorithm improvement, we enhanced
the global hydrological model H08 to simulate the bioenergy yield from two
dedicated herbaceous bioenergy crops: Miscanthus and switchgrass. Site-specific
evaluations showed that the enhanced model had the ability to simulate yield
for both Miscanthus and switchgrass, with the calibrated yields being well within the
ranges of the observed yield. Independent country-specific evaluations
further confirmed the performance of the H08 (v.bio1). Using this improved
model, we found that unconstrained irrigation more than doubled the yield
under rainfed condition, but reduced the water use efficiency (WUE) by
32 % globally. With irrigation, the yield in dry climate zones can exceed
the rainfed yields in tropical climate zones. Nevertheless, due to the low
water consumption in tropical areas, the highest WUE was found in tropical
climate zones, regardless of whether the crop was irrigated. Our enhanced
model provides a new tool for the future assessment of bioenergy–water
tradeoffs.
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Reference53 articles.
1. Ai, Z., Hanasaki, N., Heck, V., Hasegawa, T., and Fujimori, S.: H08 (v.bio1), Zenodo, https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3521407, 2019. 2. Ai, Z., Wang, Q., Yang, Y., Manevski, K., Yi, S., and Zhao, X.: Variation of
gross primary production, evapotranspiration and water use efficiency for
global croplands, Agr. Forest Meteorol., 287, 107935,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2020.107935, 2020. 3. Anderson, M. C., Norman, J. M., Mecikalski, J. R., Otkin, J. A., and Kustas,
W. P. A.: A climatological study of evapotranspiration and moisture stress
across the continental United States based on thermal remote sensing: 1.
Model formulation, JGR Atmospheres, 112, D10117, https://doi.org/10.1029/2006jd007506,
2007. 4. Arnold, J. G., Kiniry, J. R., Srinivasan, R., Williams, J. R., and Haney, E. B.,
and Neitsch, S. L.: SWAT 2012 Input/Output Documentation, Texas Water
Resources Institute, Tamu, USA, 650 pp., 2013. 5. Bauer, N., Rose, S. K., Fujimori, S., Van Vuuren, D. P., Weyant, J., Wise,
M., Cui, Y., Daioglou, V., Gidden, M. J., Kato, E., Kitous, A., Leblanc, F.,
Sands, R., Sano, F., Strefler, J., Tsutsui, J., Bibas, R., Fricko, O.,
Hasegawa, T., Klein, D., Kurosawa, A., Mima, S., and Muratori, M.: Global energy
sector emission reductions and bioenergy use: overview of the bioenergy
demand phase of the EMF-33 model comparison, Climatic Change, 1–16,
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-018-2226-y, 2018.
Cited by
10 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|