Global estimates of CO sources with high resolution by adjoint inversion of multiple satellite datasets (MOPITT, AIRS, SCIAMACHY, TES)
Author:
Kopacz M.,Jacob D. J.,Fisher J. A.,Logan J. A.,Zhang L.,Megretskaia I. A.,Yantosca R. M.,Singh K.,Henze D. K.,Burrows J. P.,Buchwitz M.,Khlystova I.,McMillan W. W.,Gille J. C.,Edwards D. P.,Eldering A.,Thouret V.,Nedelec P.
Abstract
Abstract. We combine CO column measurements from the MOPITT, AIRS, SCIAMACHY, and TES satellite instruments in a full-year (May 2004–April 2005) global inversion of CO sources at 4°×5° spatial resolution and monthly temporal resolution. The inversion uses the GEOS-Chem chemical transport model (CTM) and its adjoint applied to MOPITT, AIRS, and SCIAMACHY. Observations from TES, surface sites (NOAA/GMD), and aircraft (MOZAIC) are used for evaluation of the a posteriori solution. Global intercomparison of the different satellite datasets using GEOS-Chem as a common intercomparison platform shows consistency between the satellite datasets and with the in situ data. The majority of the differences between the datasets can be explained by different averaging kernels and a priori information. The global CO emission from combustion as constrained in the inversion is 1350 Tg a−1, with an additional 217 Tg a−1 from oxidation of co-emitted VOCs. This is much higher than current bottom-up emission inventories. Consistent with both the satellite and in situ data, a large fraction of the correction results from a seasonal underestimate of CO sources at northern mid-latitudes and suggests a larger-than-expected CO source from vehicle cold starts and residential heating. A posteriori emissions also indicate a general underestimation of biomass burning relative to the GFED2 inventory. However, the tropical biomass burning constraints are not consistent across the different datasets. Although the datasets reveal regional inconsistencies over tropical biomass burning regions, we find the global emission estimates to be a balance of information from all three instruments.
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Reference91 articles.
1. Andreae, M. O. and Merlet, P.: Emission of trace gases and aerosols from biomass burning, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 15(4), 955–966, 2001. 2. Arellano, A. F., Kasibhatla, P. S., Giglio, L., van der Werf, G. R., and Randerson, J. T.: Top-down estimates of global CO sources using MOPITT measurements, Geophys. Res. Lett., 31, L01104, https://doi.org/10.1029/2003GL018609, 2004. 3. Arellano, A. F. and Hess, P. G.: Sensitivity of top-down estimates of CO sources to GCTM transport, Geophys. Res. Lett., 33(21), L21807, https://doi.org/10.1029/2006GL027371, 2006. 4. Arellano, A. F., Kasibhatla, P. S., Giglio, L., van der Werf, G. R., Randerson, J. T., and Collatz, G. J.: Time-dependent inversion estimates of global biomass-burning CO emissions using Measurement of Pollution in the Troposphere (MOPITT) measurements, J. Geophys. Res., 111, D09303, https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JD006613, 2006. 5. Bey, I., Jacob, D. J., Yantosca, R. M., Logan, J. A., Field, B. D., Fiore, A. M., Li, Q., Liu, H. Y., Mickley, L. J., and Schultz, M. G.: Global modeling of tropospheric chemistry with assimilated meteorology: Model description and evaluation, J. Geophys. Res., 106, 23073–23096, 2001.
Cited by
5 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|