Technical Note Formal blind intercomparison of OH measurements: results from the international campaign HOxComp
Author:
Schlosser E.,Brauers T.,Dorn H.-P.,Fuchs H.,Häseler R.,Hofzumahaus A.,Holland F.,Wahner A.,Kanaya Y.,Kajii Y.,Miyamoto K.,Nishida S.,Watanabe K.,Yoshino A.,Kubistin D.,Martinez M.,Rudolf M.,Harder H.,Berresheim H.,Elste T.,Plass-Dülmer C.,Stange G.,Schurath U.
Abstract
Abstract. Hydroxyl radicals (OH) are the major oxidizing species in the troposphere. Because of their central importance, absolute measurements of their concentrations are needed to validate chemical mechanisms of atmospheric models. The extremely low and highly variable concentrations in the troposphere, however, make measurements of OH difficult. Three techniques are currently used worldwide for tropospheric observations of OH after about 30 years of technical developments: Differential Optical Laser Absorption Spectroscopy (DOAS), Laser-Induced Fluorescence Spectroscopy (LIF), and Chemical Ionisation Mass Spectrometry (CIMS). Even though many measurement campaigns with OH data were published, the question of accuracy and precision is still under discussion. Here, we report results of the first formal, blind intercomparison of these techniques. Six OH instruments (4 LIF, 1 CIMS, 1 DOAS) participated successfully in the ground-based, international HOxComp campaign carried out in Jülich, Germany, in summer 2005. Comparisons were performed for three days in ambient air (3 LIF, 1 CIMS) and for six days in the atmosphere simulation chamber SAPHIR (3 LIF, 1 DOAS). All instruments were found to measure tropospheric OH concentrations with high sensitivity and good time resolution. The pairwise correlations between different data sets were linear and yielded high correlation coefficients (r2=0.75−0.96). Excellent absolute agreement was observed for the instruments at the SAPHIR chamber, yielding slopes between 1.01 and 1.13 in the linear regressions. In ambient air, the slopes deviated from unity by factors of 1.06 to 1.69, which can partly be explained by the stated instrumental accuracies. In addition, sampling inhomogeneities and calibration problems have apparently contributed to the discrepancies. The absolute intercepts of the linear regressions did not exceed 0.6×106 cm−3, mostly being insignificant and of minor importance for daytime observations of OH. No relevant interferences with respect to ozone, water vapour, NOx and peroxy radicals could be detected. The HOxComp campaign has demonstrated that OH can be measured reasonably well by current instruments, but also that there is still room for improvement of calibrations.
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Reference65 articles.
1. Apel, E. C., Brauers, T. Koppman, R., Bandowe, B., Bossmeyer, J., Holzke, C., Tillmann, R., Wahner, A., Wegener, R., Brunner, A., Jocher, M., Ruuskanen, T., Spirig, C., Steigner, D., Steinbrecher, R., Gomez Alvarez, E., Müller, K., Burrows, J. P., Schade, G., Solomon, S. J., Ladstätter-Weissenmayer, A., Simmonds, P., Young, D., Hopkins, J. R., Lewis, A. C., Legreid, G., Reimann, S., Hansel, A., Wisthaler, A., Blake, R. S., Ellis, A. M., Monks, P. S., and Wyche, K. P.: Intercomparison of oxygenated volatile organic compound measurements at the SAPHIR atmosphere simulation chamber, J. Geophys. Res., 113, D20307, https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JD009865, 2008. 2. Armerding, W., Spiekermann, M., and Comes, F. J.: OH multipass absorption: Absolute and in situ method for local monitoring of tropospheric hydroxyl radicals, J. Geophys. Res., 99(D1), 1225–1239, https://doi.org/10.1029/93JD02859, 1994. 3. Aschmutat, U., Hessling, M., Holland, F., and Hofzumahaus, A.: A tunable source of hydroxyl (OH) and hydroperoxy (HO2) radicals: in the range between 10$^6$ and 10$^9$ cm−3, in: Proc. of the 6th European Symposium: Physico-Chemical Behaviour of Atmospheric Pollutants 2, edited by: Angeletti, G. and Restelli, G., Varese, Report EUR 15609/2 EN, 811–816, 1994. 4. Beck, S. M., Bendura, R. J., Dougal, D. S., Hoell, J. M., Gregory, G. L., Curfman, H. J., Davis, D. D., Bradshaw, J., Rodgers, M. O., Wang, C. C., Davis, L. I., Campbell, M. J., Torres, A. T., Carroll, M. A., Ridley, B. A., Sachse, G. W., Hill, G. F., Condon, E. P., and Rasmussen, R. A.: Operational overview of NASA GTE/CITE 1 airborne instrument intercomparisons: carbon monoxide, nitric oxide, and hydroxyl instrumentation, J. Geophys. Res., 92, 1977–1985, 1987. 5. Berresheim, H., Elste, T., Plass-Dülmer, C., Eisele, F. L., Tanner, D. J.: Chemical ionization mass spectrometer for long-term measurements of atmospheric OH and H2SO4, Int. J. Mass Spectrom., 202(1–3), 91–109, https://doi.org/10.1016/S1387-3806(00)00233-5, 2000.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|