Simulating net ecosystem exchange under seasonal snow cover at an Arctic tundra site
-
Published:2024-02-15
Issue:3
Volume:21
Page:825-841
-
ISSN:1726-4189
-
Container-title:Biogeosciences
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Biogeosciences
Author:
Dutch Victoria R.ORCID, Rutter NickORCID, Wake Leanne, Sonnentag Oliver, Hould Gosselin Gabriel, Sandells MelodyORCID, Derksen ChrisORCID, Walker Branden, Meyer Gesa, Essery RichardORCID, Kelly Richard, Marsh PhillipORCID, Boike JuliaORCID, Detto Matteo
Abstract
Abstract. Estimates of winter (snow-covered non-growing season) CO2 fluxes across the Arctic region vary by a factor of 3.5, with considerable variation between measured and simulated fluxes. Measurements of snow properties, soil temperatures, and net ecosystem exchange (NEE) at Trail Valley Creek, NWT, Canada, allowed for the evaluation of simulated winter NEE in a tundra environment with the Community Land Model (CLM5.0). Default CLM5.0 parameterisations did not adequately simulate winter NEE in this tundra environment, with near-zero NEE (< 0.01 gCm-2d-1) simulated between November and mid-May. In contrast, measured NEE was broadly positive (indicating net CO2 release) from snow-cover onset until late April. Changes to the parameterisation of snow thermal conductivity, required to correct for a cold soil temperature bias, reduced the duration for which no NEE was simulated. Parameter sensitivity analysis revealed the critical role of the minimum soil moisture threshold of decomposition (Ψmin) in regulating winter soil respiration. The default value of this parameter (Ψmin) was too high, preventing simulation of soil respiration for the vast majority of the snow-covered season. In addition, the default rate of change of soil respiration with temperature (Q10) was too low, further contributing to poor model performance during winter. As Ψmin and Q10 had opposing effects on the magnitude of simulated winter soil respiration, larger negative values of Ψmin and larger positive values of Q10 are required to simulate wintertime NEE more adequately.
Funder
Natural Environment Research Council
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Reference109 articles.
1. Amiro, B.: Estimating annual carbon dioxide eddy fluxes using open-path analysers for cold forest sites, Agr. Forest Meteorol., 150, 1366–1372, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2010.06.007, 2010. 2. Andrén, O. and Paustian, K.: Barley Straw Decomposition in the Field: A Comparison of Models, Ecology, 68, 1190–1200, https://doi.org/10.2307/1939203, 1987. 3. Baldocchi, D. D.: Assessing the eddy covariance technique for evaluating carbon dioxide exchange rates of ecosystems: past, present and future, Glob. Change Biol., 9, 479–492, https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2486.2003.00629.x, 2003. 4. Barrere, M., Domine, F., Decharme, B., Morin, S., Vionnet, V., and Lafaysse, M.: Evaluating the performance of coupled snow–soil models in SURFEXv8 to simulate the permafrost thermal regime at a high Arctic site, Geosci. Model Dev., 10, 3461–3479, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-3461-2017, 2017. 5. Belshe, E. F., Schuur, E. A., and Bolker, B. M.: Tundra ecosystems observed to be CO2 sources due to differential amplification of the carbon cycle, Ecol. Lett., 16, 1307–1315, https://doi.org/10.1111/ele.12164, 2013.
|
|