Regionally optimized high-resolution input datasets enhance the representation of snow cover in CLM5
-
Published:2024-08-16
Issue:4
Volume:15
Page:1073-1115
-
ISSN:2190-4987
-
Container-title:Earth System Dynamics
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Earth Syst. Dynam.
Author:
Malle Johanna Teresa, Mazzotti GiuliaORCID, Karger Dirk Nikolaus, Jonas Tobias
Abstract
Abstract. Land surface processes, crucial for exchanging carbon, nitrogen, water, and energy between the atmosphere and terrestrial Earth, significantly impact the climate system. Many of these processes vary considerably at small spatial and temporal scales, in particular in mountainous terrain and complex topography. To examine the impact of spatial resolution and representativeness of input data on modelled land surface processes, we conducted simulations using the Community Land Model 5 (CLM5) at different resolutions and based on a range of input datasets over the spatial extent of Switzerland. Using high-resolution meteorological forcing and land use data, we found that increased resolution substantially improved the representation of snow cover in CLM5 (up to 52 % enhancement), allowing CLM5 to closely match performance of a dedicated snow model. However, a simple lapse-rate-based temperature downscaling provided large positive effects on model performance, even if simulations were based on coarse-resolution forcing datasets only. Results demonstrate the need for resolutions higher than 0.25° for accurate snow simulations in topographically complex terrain. These findings have profound implications for climate impact studies. As improvements were observed across the cascade of dependencies in the land surface model, high spatial resolution and high-quality forcing data become necessary for accurately capturing the effects of a declining snow cover and consequent shifts in the vegetation period, particularly in mountainous regions. This study further highlights the utility of multi-resolution modelling experiments when aiming to improve representation of variables in land surface models. By embracing high-resolution modelling, we can enhance our understanding of the land surface and its response to climate change.
Funder
Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Reference85 articles.
1. Ali, A. A., Xu, C., Rogers, A., Fisher, R. A., Wullschleger, S. D., Massoud, E. C., Vrugt, J. A., Muss, J. D., McDowell, N. G., Fisher, J. B., Reich, P. B., and Wilson, C. J.: A global scale mechanistic model of photosynthetic capacity (LUNA V1.0), Geosci. Model Dev., 9, 587–606, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-587-2016, 2016. a 2. Anderson, E. A.: A Point Energy and Mass Balance Model of a Snow Cover, NOAA Tech. Rep. 19, 150 pp., U.S. Department of Commerce, Silver Spring, Md, 1976. a 3. Ban-Weiss, G. A., Bala, G., Cao, L., Pongratz, J., and Caldeira, K.: Climate forcing and response to idealized changes in surface latent and sensible heat, Environ. Res. Lett., 6, 034032, https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/6/3/034032, 2011. a 4. Barnett, T. P., Adam, J. C., and Lettenmaier, D. P.: Potential impacts of a warming climate on water availability in snow-dominated regions, Nature, 438, 303–309, https://doi.org/10.1038/nature04141, 2005. a, b 5. Bartelt, P. and Lehning, M.: A physical SNOWPACK model for the Swiss avalanche warning Part I: numerical model, Cold Reg. Sci. Technol., 35, 123–145, 2002. a
|
|