The SPARC water vapour assessment II: comparison of stratospheric and lower mesospheric water vapour time series observed from satellites
-
Published:2018-07-25
Issue:7
Volume:11
Page:4435-4463
-
ISSN:1867-8548
-
Container-title:Atmospheric Measurement Techniques
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Atmos. Meas. Tech.
Author:
Khosrawi Farahnaz, Lossow StefanORCID, Stiller Gabriele P.ORCID, Rosenlof Karen H.ORCID, Urban Joachim, Burrows John P.ORCID, Damadeo Robert P.ORCID, Eriksson PatrickORCID, García-Comas MayaORCID, Gille John C., Kasai Yasuko, Kiefer Michael, Nedoluha Gerald E., Noël StefanORCID, Raspollini PieraORCID, Read William G., Rozanov Alexei, Sioris Christopher E., Walker Kaley A.ORCID, Weigel KatjaORCID
Abstract
Abstract. Time series of stratospheric and lower mesospheric water vapour
using 33 data sets from 15 different satellite instruments were compared in
the framework of the second SPARC (Stratosphere-troposphere Processes And
their Role in Climate) water vapour assessment (WAVAS-II). This comparison
aimed to provide a comprehensive overview of the typical uncertainties in the
observational database that can be considered in the future in observational
and modelling studies, e.g addressing stratospheric water vapour trends. The
time series comparisons are presented for the three latitude bands, the
Antarctic (80∘–70∘ S), the tropics
(15∘ S–15∘ N) and the Northern Hemisphere mid-latitudes
(50∘–60∘ N) at four different altitudes (0.1, 3, 10 and
80 hPa) covering the stratosphere and lower mesosphere. The combined
temporal coverage of observations from the 15 satellite instruments allowed
the consideration of the time period 1986–2014. In addition to the
qualitative comparison of the time series, the agreement of the data sets is
assessed quantitatively in the form of the spread (i.e. the difference
between the maximum and minimum volume mixing ratios among the data sets),
the (Pearson) correlation coefficient and the drift (i.e. linear changes of
the difference between time series over time). Generally, good agreement
between the time series was found in the middle stratosphere while larger
differences were found in the lower mesosphere and near the tropopause.
Concerning the latitude bands, the largest differences were found in the
Antarctic while the best agreement was found for the tropics. From our
assessment we find that most data sets can be considered in future
observational and modelling studies, e.g. addressing stratospheric and lower
mesospheric water vapour variability and trends, if data set specific
characteristics (e.g. drift) and restrictions (e.g. temporal and spatial
coverage) are taken into account.
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Subject
Atmospheric Science
Reference67 articles.
1. Avery, M. A., Davis, S. M., Rosenlof, K. H., Ye, H., and Dessler,
A. E.: Large anomalies in lower stratospheric water vapour and ice during
the 2015-2016 El Niño, Nat. Geosci., 10, 405–409,
https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo2961, 2017. a 2. Bates, D. R. and Nicolet, M.: The photochemistry of atmospheric water
vapor, J. Geophys. Res., 55, 301–327,
https://doi.org/10.1029/JZ055i003p00301, 1950. a, b 3. Brewer, A. W.: Evidence for a world circulation provided by the
measurements
of helium and water vapour distribution in the stratosphere, Q.
J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 75, 351–363,
https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.49707532603, 1949. a 4. Brinkop, S., Dameris, M., Jöckel, P., Garny, H., Lossow, S., and Stiller,
G.: The millennium water vapour drop in chemistry–climate model simulations,
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 8125–8140, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-8125-2016,
2016. a 5. Damadeo, R. P., Zawodny, J. M., Remsberg, E. E., and Walker, K. A.: The
impact of nonuniform sampling on stratospheric ozone trends derived from
occultation instruments, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 535–554,
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-535-2018, 2018. a
Cited by
12 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|