New calibration procedures for airborne turbulence measurements and accuracy of the methane fluxes during the AirMeth campaigns
-
Published:2018-07-31
Issue:7
Volume:11
Page:4567-4581
-
ISSN:1867-8548
-
Container-title:Atmospheric Measurement Techniques
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Atmos. Meas. Tech.
Author:
Hartmann JörgORCID, Gehrmann Martin, Kohnert KatrinORCID, Metzger StefanORCID, Sachs TorstenORCID
Abstract
Abstract. Low-level flights over tundra wetlands in Alaska and Canada have been
conducted during the Airborne Measurements of Methane Emissions (AirMeth) campaigns to measure turbulent methane fluxes
in the atmosphere. In this paper we describe the instrumentation and new
calibration procedures for the essential pressure parameters required for
turbulence sensing by aircraft that exploit suitable regular measurement
flight legs without the need for dedicated calibration patterns. We estimate
the accuracy of the mean wind and the turbulence measurements. We show that
airborne measurements of turbulent fluxes of methane and carbon dioxide using
cavity ring-down spectroscopy trace gas analysers together with established
turbulence equipment achieve a relative accuracy similar to that of
measurements of sensible heat flux if applied during low-level flights over
natural area sources. The inertial subrange of the trace gas fluctuations
cannot be resolved due to insufficient high-frequency precision of the
analyser, but, since this scatter is uncorrelated with the vertical wind
velocity, the covariance and thus the flux are reproduced correctly. In the
covariance spectra the -7/3 drop-off in the inertial subrange can be
reproduced if sufficient data are available for averaging. For convective
conditions and flight legs of several tens of kilometres we estimate the flux
detection limit to be about
4 mg m−2 d−1 for
w′CH4′‾,
1.4 g m−2 d−1 for w′CO2′‾ and
4.2 W m−2 for the sensible heat flux.
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
Subject
Atmospheric Science
Reference38 articles.
1. Baer, D. S., Paul, J. B., Gupta, M. and O'Keefe, A.:
Sensitivity absorption measurements in a near-infrared region using off-axis integrated-cavity-output spectroscopy,
Appl. Phys. B, 75, 261–265,
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00340-002-0971-z,
2002. a 2. Billesbach, D. P.:
Estimating uncertainties in individual eddy covariance flux measurements: A comparison of methods and a proposed new method,
Agr. Forest Meteorol. 151, 394–405,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2010.12.001,
2011. a 3. Bousquet, P., Ringeval, B., Pison, I., Dlugokencky, E. J., Brunke, E.-G., Carouge, C., Chevallier, F., Fortems-Cheiney, A.,
Frankenberg, C., Hauglustaine, D. A., Krummel, P. B., Langenfelds, R. L., Ramonet, M., Schmidt, M., Steele, L. P., Szopa, S.,
Yver, C., Viovy, N., and Ciais, P.: Source attribution of the changes in atmospheric methane for 2006–2008, Atmos. Chem. Phys.,
11, 3689–3700, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-3689-2011, 2011. a 4. Cambaliza, M. O. L., Shepson, P. B., Caulton, D. R., Stirm, B., Samarov, D., Gurney, K. R., Turnbull, J., Davis, K. J., Possolo, A.,
Karion, A., Sweeney, C., Moser, B., Hendricks, A., Lauvaux, T., Mays, K., Whetstone, J., Huang, J., Razlivanov, I., Miles, N. L.,
and Richardson, S. J.: Assessment of uncertainties of an aircraft-based mass balance approach for quantifying urban greenhouse gas
emissions, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 9029–9050, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-9029-2014, 2014. a 5. Chen, H., Winderlich, J., Gerbig, C., Hoefer, A., Rella, C. W., Crosson, E. R., Van Pelt, A. D., Steinbach, J., Kolle, O., Beck, V.,
Daube, B. C., Gottlieb, E. W., Chow, V. Y., Santoni, G. W., and Wofsy, S. C.: High-accuracy continuous airborne measurements of
greenhouse gases (CO2 and CH4) using the cavity ring-down spectroscopy (CRDS) technique, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 3, 375–386, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-3-375-2010, 2010. a
Cited by
19 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|